Logic+empricism was invented way before science with mixed results. — Qmeri
At least I find new logically proven mathematical theories quite reliable even before they are confirmed empirically — Qmeri
The word “logic” has faced the same fate as every other word in our common language - it has become ill defined. — Qmeri
Fundamentally, logic is the analysis of rules. — Qmeri
The idea of Limics, where literally everything about everything is explained through this "limitation information" is quite new, I think. — Qmeri
The law of non-contradiction is just a part of limics - the part that says that paradoxes are not possible. Limics has other properties like everything that has to do with analysis of logical rules that don't form paradoxes. Thus Limics is not the same as the law of non-contradiction.
Also, limics is not just about uncertainty - if you limit all but one possible option off, you are left with certainty in that one option.
When we don't have the information that x=2 and we only know that x is between 1 and 3, the only thing we can say with our information is that x is between 1 and 3. This is not redundant. It is the correct description of the information we have. x=2 would be incorrect description. — Qmeri
Also if you could be so kind to provide us with a numbered list of your theories foundations it would be great. — TheMadFool
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.