Conviction, of course, when McConnell nominates Merritt Garland for the Supreme Court, or when hell freezes, or republicans en masse grow a pair.

Deranged rabble rousing propaganda? Why is this here?

Deranged rabble rousing propaganda? Why is this here? — Diagonal Diogenes

Typical republican-style no-substance reply. What is deranged? What about it is rabble-rousing? What about it is propaganda? And it's here because it's timely. And if all of these things, why did you vote. Or did I just miss a joke by a mile?

What a joke. Who cares what you think on this forum? Self indulgent rubbish. You need to step back a little and look at yourself.

A more pertinent question of philosophy would be:

Why do apparently smart people feel the need to proselytize about their political flavor?

I'd wager, is that it has something to do with Cipolla's Five Laws.

"Mommy, Mommy! Bett, Diog and Timmy are fighting again!"

Just for fun: — tim wood

I don't know. I imagined fun to look entirely different.

Me too. It's a different time. Oh, for the 60s again. Who knew that was the innocent time?

Actually I apologise for that outburst.

Edit: bloody politics!

Convict and remove.

Not arrested ... soon enough.

(Ex-presidents who are also ex-billionaires don't get perp-walked in plastic bracelets ... Guessing novichok for this Kremlin bitch when he starts ratting-out Russian wiseguys like a day-glo dead man tweeting just to stay out of Club Fed. Or maybe just an orange-tipped full metal jacket from an alt-right tRumpstain who wants to make him a martyr to rally other inbreds around for "the race war to come." Or a massive coronary while heaving pathetically against an impassably constipated bowel would suffice (NY Post headline: The Shit Couldn't Even Shit Straight!). Bothers me (not much) that I lack enough human decency to feel anything remotely like pity or sympathy for his candy-assed clueless brats and the :fire: hell :fire: the rest of their tasteless, insipid, craven lives are likely to become starting the day after Daddy Dearest has finally fucked off for the last time.)

Or a massive coronary while heaving pathetically against an impassably constipated bowel would suffice (NY Post headline: The Shit Couldn't Even Shit Right!) — 180 Proof

I vote for this. :clap:

I thought my post was unreasonable. I see I was wrong.

In fairness, this belongs in the Lounge at best.

Just for fun:
impeachment assumed.
Vote to convict/acquit. — tim wood

I missed the "aquit" and immediately vote in for a second term. :up:
I mean if he can do me a favor :100:

Hmmm interesting that Ms. Pelosi is no where to be found but rather hands off such an important vote. :chin:

I wonder if she does not wish to be in these
pictures in history books. :monkey:

Gosh, 180, tell us how you really feel.

:kiss:

:heart: It's so good to read you on the boards 180!
Your presence is a breath of fresh air and sunshine aimed high :cool:

Trump should be convicted, removed, and consequently arrested, but in actuality he will acquitted and most likely not arrested even after leaving office.

Thank you, Madam Speaker! :flower:

Abuse of Power 230-197

Obstruction of Justice 229-198 — 116th Congress, H. Res. 755:

MAGA - antifascist, pro-democracy style.

:wink:

Impeachment of a president. ---- They say he did something wrong.

A trial without any crime being committed. ---- He says he has done nothing wrong.

And the polls show an immediate rise in popularity. ---- ?

Does that mean that the public approves of him doing something wrong if it will make America great again?

:naughty: MERRY IMPEACHMAS, MURICA! :halo:

You know you can leave this website right? I'm sure there's some club you fit in.