Are you seriously suggesting her "shit" is in any way comparable to the people who are to blame? — Benkei
I'm saying people should stop announcing the end of times. — Tzeentch
You and your kind, like Greta, would rather find a group to hate, than find a solution.
I am on the solution party. Go out, hate with Greta. — god must be atheist
There still is no political will to solve this problem. — Benkei
Sanctimonious nonsense. There still is no political will to solve this problem. Greta is doing a lot more in getting political interests aligned to actually do something about it than you ever will. The hubris to suggest your ostrich politics of denialism are part of the solution is simply laughable. — Benkei
Benkei
2.2k
↪god must be atheist Scientism.
I didn't know it was physically possible to both suck and blow at the same time but well done. — Benkei
You are missing the point, Staticphotn. We are all keep on burning, no matter which side of the sticker line we are on. It does not matter whether one gives a shit or not. If you give a shit, you keep burning the fossil fuels. If you don't give a shit you keep on burning the fossil fuels. You are blind to this?? . — god must be atheist
It is only technology and science that can solve that problem, not votes. — god must be atheist
It is only technology and science that can solve that problem, not votes.
— god must be atheist
That is rather naïve. Science will lay down the facts, but sadly it is the politicians who influence people to vote, not the facts. — staticphoton
It is only technology and science that can solve that problem, not votes.
— god must be atheist
That is rather naïve. Science will lay down the facts, but sadly it is the politicians who influence people to vote, not the facts. — staticphoton
So... Greta is a politician?
It is not only the politician that makes people vote one way or another. it is the scientists who have given us the facts about global warming / climate change. It is not the politicians who've given us that insight. — god must be atheist
If all the politicians were employed in political ways to reverse or stop the global warming effects, but all scientists were forbidden to work on it, (as a hypothetical situation), how far would we get to solving the problem? — god must be atheist
I applaud you for being a person who gets his information from scientific journals, but I'm pretty sure most people become acquainted with current events through television and the internet. — staticphoton
Why are you fighting that, and why are you trying to distort the truth, denouncing scientific work and denouncing the importance of it? — god must be atheist
Denouncing scientific work? I'm a scientist. — staticphoton
You didn't pick up the fact that my argument was against people, not science. — staticphoton
global warming, half the world's population doesn't believe in it. Why do you think that is? — staticphoton
I suggested it is scientists who we must rely on to solve the situation and we must not rely on finding and segregating a group to be the target of our anger because that will lead to no solution — god must be atheist
who is pissed off at the world, much like everyone else is, and talks about third person singular about those who have created this problem -- not realizing the she, and everyone else, is equally guilty of contributing to the problem, or would be if given a chance. — god must be atheist
I am not sure from your English if they have approved the use of nuclear power or they just have the power (political power) to approve it or not. Please report back to me what you meant.They also decide on the procurement of nuclear power. — Punshhh
Because it seems to me she is making a contribution, and about the best that she, or anyone like her, can make. — tim wood
It seems, then, that youThis is the "guilt" I am talking about. — god must be atheist
not just humanity, but the human condition. That's neither reasonable nor balanced.vehemently oppose, and find deplorable. — god must be atheist
Her imagination? If anyone's squandered non-renewable resources it wasn't her. Whom do you think did squander them? And further, I am not a student of her rhetoric, but I am under the impression that her arguments are towards and against those squandering.because in Greta's imagination the previous generations have squandered non-renewable resources and that she blames them for. — god must be atheist
This is the "guilt" I am talking about. I used the word "guilt" becuase in Greta's imagination the previous generations shouldn't have squandered non-renewable resources and that she blames them for. — god must be atheist
It seems, then, that you
vehemently oppose, and find deplorable.
— god must be atheist
not just humanity, but the human condition. That's neither reasonable nor balanced. — tim wood
No she is not, Little Brain. She is trying to find a scape goat; she is inciting anger; she is segregating a group or trying to find one to segregate, to take her anger out on. THIS IS NOT HELPFUL, AND SHE IS NOT HELPING THE SITUATION, SHE IS ONLY BUILDING HATRED AND DISSENT. — god must be atheist
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.