-
Galuchat
809I am researching different philosophies but it is tiresome and time consuming to try learn the ins and outs of each of them through online web pages, published papers and books, and countless forums. On top of this I could easily have scanned past something important. Any help would be appreciated. — Otto Ogliaro
Writing what you know is easier than knowing what you write. -
180 Proof
15.3kWelcome to TPF ...
How about (3) traditionalist conservatism? & (4) cyrenaic hedonism?
Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.
Categories
- Guest category
- The Lounge
- General Philosophy
- Metaphysics & Epistemology
- Philosophy of Mind
- Ethics
- Political Philosophy
- Philosophy of Art
- Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Language
- Interesting Stuff
- Politics and Current Affairs
- Humanities and Social Sciences
- Science and Technology
- Non-English Discussion
- German Discussion
- Spanish Discussion
- Learning Centre
- Resources
- Books and Papers
- Reading groups
- Questions
- Guest Speakers
- David Pearce
- Massimo Pigliucci
- Debates
- Debate Proposals
- Debate Discussion
- Feedback
- Article submissions
- About TPF
- Help
More Discussions
- Elemental philosophy, on teaching philosophy to kids, from protophilosophy upwards
- Dubious Stance: "Philosophy Questions. Religion Preaches. I Choose Philosophy."
- Are most solutions in philosophy based on pre-philosophical notions/intuitions? Is Philosophy useful
- Philosophy 101, 8 minute lectures pertaining philosophy.
- Would a “science-based philosophy” be “better” than the contemporary philosophy?
- Other sites we like
- Social media
- Terms of Service
- Sign In
- Created with PlushForums
- © 2024 The Philosophy Forum