You said you offered suggestions on how to implement 2 and 5. I didn't see them.

No, I did not say that. I asked you what is the problem, then suggested you do not know what is the problem, and finally I said what is the real problem and how to solve it. Overall, nothing to do with 2 and 5, but 3 and 4.

No, I did not say that. I asked you what is the problem, then suggested you do not know what is the problem, and finally I said what is the real problem and how to solve it. Overall, nothing to do with 2 and 5, but 3 and 4. — Zelebg

Someone using your handle wrote:

↪fishfry
Because nobody knows how to implement 2 and 5, or even if it's possible to do so.

Not known is 'what' to implement, so 'how' is not even a question yet. But what I am suggesting here is both what and how to implement, and relevant part is hardware configuration, not software modules. — Zelebg

I ask again: How do you implement 2 and 5?

I ask again: How do you implement 2 and 5?

You are misinterpreting and I already explained your error.

You are misinterpreting and I already explained your error. — Zelebg

Do you know how to implement 2 and 5? Yes or no?

Yes.

Yes. — Zelebg

Are you keeping it secret?

My 3. and 4. are hardware, yours software. — Zelebg

3. Display A: visual output inner -> feeds into 4.
4. Camera B: visual input inner -> feeds into 5.

How do you figure that it HAS to be hardware? Why would software need internal a viewing screen for another camera to watch? Why not just go from 2 to 5 without the BS in the middle.

It would make more sense if the external camera feed "showed" (3) the recognition program the data so that it could "see" (4) it. which is exactly as what a facial recognition program does.

Are you keeping it secret? — fishfry

Of course he is, but all will be revealed when he goes to pick up his Nobel prize.