Would you mind expanding on why it's a bad place to stay? — DoppyTheElv
A made-up statistic, chosen for it's appearance. Amen is not concerned with the truth of his statement, only withthe rhetorical effect. That's the technical definition of bullshitPlease then explain why over at least 75% of the philosophical domains invoke God's existence? — 3017amen
An ad hom.You must be one of the angry atheists LoL — 3017amen
Shifting the burden of proof - rather than providing evidence for his claim he demands that we provide evidnece that he is wrongProvide statistics that prove me wrong. — 3017amen
another ad hom.if you're scared say you're scared. — 3017amen
The concept of God, right or wrong, is always invoked in the majority of philosophical domain's as the criterion for the existence of things. — 3017amen
Please then explain why over at least 75% of the philosophical domains invoke God's existence? — 3017amen
suppose, next, 72.8% of academic philosophers are "fanatical atheists", 3017amen. :roll:
Give it up, raving on with mis/disinformation doesn't do anyone any favors. — jorndoe
I ceased replying for a while because my interest in philosophy is distracting me of what I should be doing-- study my physics and chemistry exams! — DoppyTheElv
But I have to ask. What should someone get from these statistics? That theism is a bad/irrational wordview to have? — DoppyTheElv
Does being an atheist also mean you're a naturalist? — DoppyTheElv
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.