• Pantagruel
    3.4k
    Just curious
    1. What is your main source of philosophical information? (9 votes)
        Books (primary texts, secondary texts, journals)
        67%
        Online sources - written (Wikipedia, Stanford EP, etc)
        22%
        Online sources - video
          0%
        Discussions (in person or virtual, including TPF)
          0%
        Other
        11%
  • 180 Proof
    15.4k
    Other: books + discussions + daily walks/hikes.
  • Wheatley
    2.3k
    I practically live on the internet.
  • Pantagruel
    3.4k
    Other: books + discussions + daily walks/hikes.180 Proof

    What are your secondary sources? :rofl:
  • praxis
    6.5k
    daily walks/hikes180 Proof

    Rousseau and Nietzsche walked to think. Kant walked through his town at the same time daily to escape the “compulsion of thought.” They say that you could set your watch by his passing.

    I've walked our dog 2-3 miles daily for probably around a decade, rarely missing a day. Listened to a lot of books on tape while walking also. They say that the physical activity and environment can be both calming and stimulate the mind.
  • 180 Proof
    15.4k
    On ne peut penser et ecrire qu'assis [One cannot think and write except when seated] (G. Flaubert). There I have caught you, nihilist! The sedentary life is the very sin against the Holy Spirit. Only thoughts reached by walking have value. — Twilight of the Idols, Maxims & Arrows (34)
    (emphasis is mine)

    :up:
  • Gmak
    6
    For me it's Wikipedia. It has been it for a while too I think.

    I can't wait to find new sources.
  • Noble Dust
    7.9k
    Any and all outside sources for crucial data; my own intuition for synthesis.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.