There are no objective truths, so the truth part of the statement "All truths are subjective" does not correspond to anything objective. — m-theory
And by definition the subjective part does not correspond to anything objective. — m-theory
The statement "All truths are subjective" does not correspond to any objective fact. — m-theory
If your judgements don't correspond to something objective, they are not facts. — m-theory
None of the statement "All truths (which are subjective) are subjective (which is not objective)" corresponds to anything that is objective by definition. — m-theory
Yes it does correspond to something that is objective. It corresponds to the fact that truth-value is something that only occurs in minds. — Terrapin Station
What part of truth value or mind is objective? — m-theory
The statement "All truths are subjective" does not correspond to any objective fact. — m-theory
Yes it does. — Terrapin Station
I get what you are saying.
You are saying that the term "truth" and the term "subjective" mean the same thing, but that is not an objective fact — m-theory
No I'm not saying that truth and subjective are the same thing. <sigh>
It seems like you're not really interested in trying to understand what it is that I'm saying. Either that or it's extremely difficult for you to understand. — Terrapin Station
So is it an objective fact or not? — m-theory
Is "lol" a subjective fact or an objective truth, and how would one tell the difference? — Bitter Crank
But you said it was a valid form for an objective fact.
Why should it not be an objective fact? — m-theory
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.