Remember, the natural afterlife is timeless, thus it can't "become" anything, it's static and so "is what it is." — Bryon Ehlmann
1) How does the natural afterlife impact various religions? Can it be seen as compatible?
2) Does the possibility of a natural afterlife benefit society? — Bryon Ehlmann
You don't say why "it would become its own hell." Remember, the natural afterlife is timeless, thus it can't "become" anything, it's static and so "is what it is." — Bryon Ehlmann
The theory, however, merely defines the NEC, implicitly claiming it as the default after-life. It does not deny the existence of a supernatural eternal consciousness or afterlife no matter how apparently illogical or (at least for now seemingly) unscientific. Such an eternal consciousness could be an after-death type of NDE or some other afterlife that immediately or later overrides the NEC — e.g., a reincarnation or a resurrection of body and soul. — Bryon K. Ehlmann
You state "Most religions describe a chain of events leading to ascension to heaven." You need to describe this chain of events more specifically. I know of no such chain, at least in Christianity. — Bryon Ehlmann
you should point out specifically a flaw in the logical deduction or the basic — Bryon Ehlmann
implicitly claiming it as the default after-life. — Bryon K. Ehlmann
Who or what states that an afterlife must be time perceptive, i.e., filled with happenings, rather than timeless? — Bryon Ehlmann
Buddhist philosophy entertains the concept of the "clear light consciousness". — David Thomas Roberts
The natural afterlife is an illusion that occurs only at death. — Bryon Ehlmann
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.