And this potentiality emergence is absurd, because being rationally possible to exist is a property of identity and no transformation of reality/identity can ever occur; meaning that it's either a 2 dimensional square circle is logically rationale or it's not, we cannot say that after day X it became logically rational, but before that it was irrational, or that the existence of an apple pie after day Y is irrational. This is violating the law of identity saying that y=y but starting from day X y=/=y if for example y is a 2D squared circle that by virtue has a logical irrational existence. — Mutakalem
I don't know man — Mutakalem
The man wants discussion, not insults. — Philosophim
Philosophy is not a feel good game, thought is brutal, it walks against the silk of delusion, it is often sand paper to the heart. — JerseyFlight
People who actually wish to change others minds understand that you must talk with people, not at people. — Philosophim
Are you familiar with contingency and emergence VS Necessity? — Mutakalem
-The potential for the emergence of any possible essence is beginningless. — Mutakalem
This is because God’s ability to bring something into existence, is proof that He can will for it to exist. So given that He can bring any possible essence into existence, then He can will for any possible essence to exist. — Mutakalem
I really think what's evil was defined evil by the ex-nhilo creating God, you cannot use what he created to define it as wrong or right, he's God, he makes whatever he wants in his creation. — Mutakalem
I blame you for the existence of this thread. — JerseyFlight
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.