Does it have to be conscious controlling, or can there be unconscious controlling? — Philosophim
You mean like the questions you evaded in the Kant thread? Sounds like another angry atheist pivoting LOL — 3017amen
Nice! — 3017amen
Do you understand my question about controlling being defined as conscious or unconscious being key to the issue? It is thus. If you define controlling as conscious, then the moment a person controls unconsciously, they are no longer in control, and not driving. Thus their death was due to a lack of driving on their part. — Philosophim
Exactly - you are asserting an illogical statement that has no basis in reality.Really? I'd call it illogical. — 3017amen
You mean like the questions you evaded in the Kant thread? Sounds like another angry atheist pivoting LOL
— 3017amen
Please reproduce. I'll gladly answer. But you have left a long string of questions you've evaded. Including the one just above. Clearly you are more interested in toxic exchange than reasonable discourse - and i think people should know that. So, lolol to you.
— tim wood
Go back on the particular thread and do your homework. Otherwise don't troll this one. — 3017amen
There is nothing wrong with having logically impossible attributes.
— 3017amen
Nothing wrong, perhaps, but when does it happen? Example, please? — tim wood
I'll disagree with you on this one. It's not that they are lying - or even stupid or ignorant.I guess we can add lying to your list of possible responses. — tim wood
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.