When we know, we know that there is a God who is the ultimate cause of all reality and that contemplation of God quiets the mind. — Dfpolis
This is one of the many quotes by religious infiltrators to our philosophy site. — god must be atheist
Types of posters who are not welcome here:
Evangelists: Those who must convince everyone that their religion, ideology, political persuasion, or philosophical theory is the only one worth having.
Racists, homophobes, sexists, Nazi sympathisers, etc.: We don't consider your views worthy of debate, and you'll be banned for espousing them.
Advertisers, spammers: Instant deletion of post followed by ban.
Trolls: You know who you are. You won't last long
Sockpuppets
They have an agenda, I presume, which is to christianize the world. They go head-butt about it, and they don't listen to reason. — god must be atheist
If you get upset by them I think it says more about you and your agenda than theirs. — Sir2u
Is this equally true of Nazis? — JerseyFlight
That doesn't answer my question. — JerseyFlight
Which g/G is that? :roll:There is no proof, as of yet, that god doesn't exist. — TheMadFool
Seriously, is there any way to compare a bunch of hyped up bible blathers to the nazis? — Sir2u
There is no proof, as of yet, that god doesn't exist. — TheMadFool
Inquisitions — JerseyFlight
Not according to any believers, theologians or religious traditions I'm aware of. — 180 Proof
No they aren't. In fact very few conceptions of god are the same. — MSC
Kind of circular then: there is no proof of the existence of an unbeliever's g/G - well, of course, but vacuous. I think was saying something more (yet unspecified) than this.I am not a believer [ ... ]
god=Any supernatural being worshipped as controlling some part of the world or some aspect of life or who is the personification of a force. — Sir2u
I'm as anti-religious as they come and I think threads like this one are just as low-quality and (for lack of a better word) disruptive as the shallow little-reasoning religious threads are.
I generally think the best solution to that kind of problem is to ignore it (on the users' part; the mods have recourse to deleting on account of low quality or evangelism).
In which case I shouldn't even be making this post, but I am anyway. — Pfhorrest
I'm as anti-religious as they come and I think threads like this one are just as low-quality and (for lack of a better word) disruptive as the shallow little-reasoning religious threads are. — Pfhorrest
I generally think the best solution to that kind of problem is to ignore it — Pfhorrest
Lots of people read these threads, some of them very likely, impressionable young people, are you claiming that a person is doing something wrong by criticizing religious error? You — JerseyFlight
You are here calling it "shallow," "little-reasoning," and comparing it to the irrationality of religion. — JerseyFlight
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.