Here, it is clear that the evil is the institution of slavery and God doesn’t favor this evil; however, the text listed above also implies the idea that instead of forcing or coercing someone to do something, it is more of God’s will to give guidance and gradually lead someone to the good path, because making people voluntarily realize their sins and return to goodness is the more meaningful way which can truly defeat the evil and guide people to the goodness. Thus, ultimately, I don’t think God has the desire to eliminate all evil directly; instead, I think that despite he doesn’t favor evil, he somehow intentionally puts evil in the world and considers it as a method to strengthen people’s faith and guide them to ultimate goodness. — Isabel Hu
Therefore, God doesn’t exist. — Isabel Hu
Actually, when and where 'true' love is supposed to exist but fails to do, we may say evil replaces it.
Similarly, scientists define the notion of 'hole' in electricity. It replaces an electron during its move (electric current). — KerimF
Actually, when and where 'true' love is supposed to exist but fails to do, we may say evil replaces it.
Similarly, scientists define the notion of 'hole' in electricity. It replaces an electron during its move (electric current). — KerimF
What is 'true' love? — schopenhauer1
Very good question indeed.
But I am afraid that if someone cannot perceive it by himself, he has no choice but seeing it as fiction and what I said about it and evil would sound to him as non-sense. — KerimF
it seems to be very likely that God actually intends to put evil in the world as an intermediary to strengthen people’s faith and ultimately align with goodness. — Isabel Hu
To go into further depth on this, God may have viewed free will as a necessity. If there wasn't free will, then, once again, it would seem that God isn't all good and he would seem more like a puppeteer messing around with his puppets. Given that free will exists, we might as well be led to assume that it brings around more good than bad, because an all good God would never do the opposite, but also gives a place for evil things to happen without god impeding upon them. If God were to stop evil, then, in many cases, it would directly be interfering with the notion of free will. — Isaac242
From what I understand, according to the Bible, Satan is the root of all evil, not God. — Emma
I believe it's safer to argue that god did not actually intend to put evil into this world, but rather it was a product of many of the good things he brought into the world, i.e. free will. — Isaac242
It is possible for an all-loving god to allow evil, despite having the power to stop it. — Down The Rabbit Hole
without the existence of God how would you have a definite standard to judge evil and if you did, where would it come from? — Ljkp
I was pre-empting an argument that any finite suffering will always be outweighed by the infinite joy of the afterlife. — Down The Rabbit Hole
1. If God exists, then
a. God has the power to eliminate all evil.
b. God knows how to eliminate all evil.
c. God has the desire to eliminate all evil.
2. If anyone has the power/knowledge/desire to eliminate all evil, then evil does not exist.
3. Therefore, if God exists, then evil does not exist.
4. Evil exists.
5. Therefore, God doesn’t exist. — Isabel Hu
If god is omnipotent then nothing can compel him to act in a certain way, — TheMadFool
That's the unknown, does evil allow for the existence of something even more valuable then the cost of evil itself? — Partinobodycular
Just as God cannot create a square circle, there may be consequences involved in eliminating evil that even God cannot avoid. — Partinobodycular
Ergo, omnibenevolence doesn't necessarily translate into a desire to end evil. — TheMadFool
does not "translate". It "means".
If you are omnibenevolent, you are incapable of seeing, creating, or tolerating suffering. This is the meaning of the word, not the interpretation of its meaning.
You are resorting to the old "interpretation" tactic of philosophy of Christians and of other religionists, in which you claim that what you see and hear is not what you see and hear but something else, which is in fact different from what you see and hear. — god must be atheist
God actually intends to put evil in the world — Isabel Hu
as an intermediary to strengthen people’s faith and ultimately align with goodness. — Isabel Hu
1 Corinthians 7:17-24, it is clear that the institution of slavery is objected or at least not favored by Christian value, — Isabel Hu
but there are no explicit words of objection delivered in Bible; instead, there is only conservative preaching such as what Paul writes in Philemon 1:14 — Isabel Hu
don’t think God has the desire to eliminate all evil directly; — Isabel Hu
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.