The space part of space time is 3-D, and since 2-D is a subset of 3-D a flat square would be just that, — jgill
correCT.I believe, to shortcut description; — god must be atheist
. CorREctmuch as you looking at one on a piece of paper. — jgill
much as you looking at one on a piece of paper. — jgill
Since this thread has slowed down, — Gregory
I don't know why he misrepresented the specific questions I was asking in such a ridiculous and demeaning way — Gregory
Other sites have functions that hide any user's posts from your sight on the site if you choose. This site does not. — god must be atheist
What a garbled mess this thread has become. — jgill
much as you looking at one on a piece of paper. — jgill
What a garbled mess this thread has become. :sad: — jgill
A true reflection of quantum physics. — Metaphysician Undercover
. . . whose existence is inferred from the mathematics — Metaphysician Undercover
electrons were like little BBs, — jgill
The question for me though, is how real are the things which are inferred from these mathematical solutions. — Metaphysician Undercover
high school students work generally in 2-D since it is easier to visualiz(S)ze and thus convey principles — jgill
It's the way I get things straight in my mind and a reflection of my core Philosophy:
"Reality" is the product of an electroMechanical d/Duality
Caused by properties of reluctance, Resistance and reactance.
c/C\creation I leave to g/G\g's AND individual Choice OR fW
Within it there are only 2 options open to any e\Entity/e:
move up/ \down in energy
OR back- +forth in spaCetime — Chris1952Engineer
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.