The lack of intelligent life is only proof of our own inadequecy which discounts the latter half — CallMeDirac
that entails there are more than a billion gods... — The Opposite
LET God = the most important thing, person, idea, or principle in your life.
IF you exist the most important thing, person, idea, or principle in your life exists.
You exist.
THEREFORE God exists. — unenlightened
What did you expect? — unenlightened
All humans like bananas.If you can find a valid proof of the existence of any damn thing that does not include its conclusions in its premises — unenlightened
Neither of the premises contain the conclusion — god must be atheist
All unenlightened philosophers have Gods.
Unenlightened is an unenlightened philosopher.
There unenlightened's god exists. — unenlightened
But don't let my destroying your arguments deter you. — god must be atheist
5.3k
LET God = the most important thing, person, idea, or principle in your life.
IF you exist the most important thing, person, idea, or principle in your life exists.
You exist.
THEREFORE God exists. — unenlightened
You seem not to have noticed in your urgency to win, that we do not even disagree. — unenlightened
I am sorry. So the first quote in this post, where I quoted you, was made in jest, as a parody? How would I know that? Because I certainly disagree with the conlcusion of the first quote. I assert that that argument is not valid. So... you wrote it as a parody? — god must be atheist
5.3k
LET God = the most important thing, person, idea, or principle in your life.
IF you exist the most important thing, person, idea, or principle in your life exists.
You exist.
THEREFORE God exists. — unenlightened
You destroy my arguments like I was making them for real, rather than parodying your arguments. — unenlightened
You seem not to have noticed in your urgency to win, that we do not even disagree. — unenlightened
I am sorry. So the first quote in this post, where I quoted you, was made in jest, as a parody? How would I know that? Because I certainly disagree with the conlcusion of the first quote. I assert that that argument is not valid. So... you wrote it as a parody? — god must be atheist
Good grief! That is a really terrible way to do philosophy. I will not engage with you further. — unenlightened
If you can find a valid proof of the existence of any damn thing that does not include its conclusions in its premises, then you either won't have noticed that it is so contained, or you won't have noticed it's invalidity. — unenlightened
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.