• dan0mac
    15
    Good evening! I'll be the first to admit I am an arm-chair philosopher. I've made my way through some Plato, Kierkegaard, Berkeley... But I would like to know some modern thinkers who you enjoy so that I can look into them. Thanks everyone!
  • Pfhorrest
    4.6k
    Harry Frankfurt.
  • fdrake
    6.6k
    Thomas Metzinger, Hubert Dreyfus. I've been on a David Graeber binge since he died, though he's more of an anthropologist.
  • Pfhorrest
    4.6k
    Graeber is great, but yeah not really philosophy exactly. Very informative for political philosophy, though.
  • TheMadFool
    13.8k
    My favorite philosophers are

    1. Pyrrho
    2. Zeno of Elea
    3. Epimenedes
    4. Nagarjuna
    5. Descartes
    6. Hume
    7. Graham Priest
  • Rafaella Leon
    59
    The most general and omnipresent feature of modern philosophy is the confusion between the order of being and the order of knowing. Defining an object by the way we know it is like defining an elephant by the properties of the lens with which we photograph it. The final scheme may be similar, but the material presence of the elephant will always be lacking. In modern times, all tigers are made of paper until the day they eat the philosopher. This error is endemic. It is present in Descartes, Spinoza, Kant, Fichte, Hegel and all of his heirs.
  • 180 Proof
    15.3k
    The typical conflation-confusion, by idealists (e.g. Plato's misplaced concreteness - reification - of "forms" ... or Berkeley's compositional fallacy of "ideas, perceptions" ... etc), of ontology with epistemology — I agree with, for the most part, except for Spinoza (vide Ethics, part one). An example of his "error"?

    *

    Some (indispensable yet underapprecated) 'moderns' in my canon:

    Peter Wessel Zapffe
    Emil Cioran
    Nelson Goodman
    Clément Rosset
    Philippa Foot
    Albert Murray
    Susan Haack
    David Schweickart
    David Deutsch
    Ray Brassier
  • tim wood
    9.3k
    Mikey - 180 - likes it! - Spinoza. Therefore I shall give it a try. Can you recommend an edition (and title)?
  • 180 Proof
    15.3k
    My top three "Spinoza" recommendations (frankly, not academically fashionable - more philosophical studies than applied uses of / deconstructive polemics for-against, S):

    A Spinoza Reader, ed. & trans. by Edwin Curley*
    Spinoza and Spinozism, Stuart Hampshire
    Spinoza and Other Heretics, Vol. 2, Yirmiyahu Yovel

    edit:

    Also, as a companion to the Reader*, Edwin Curley's excellent interpretative study

    Behind The Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza's Ethics
  • SophistiCat
    2.2k
    Curious, why would you want to solicit opinions from a few random people on the Internet? If you want to know who the best known or most influential modern philosophers are, you will do much better with Google.
  • Rafaella Leon
    59
    The best modern philosophers are Louis Lavelle, Leibniz, Eric Voeglin, however, the best one by far, and very underestimated is Mário Ferreira dos Santos, I don't think there is someone better than him in the last centuries.
  • dan0mac
    15
    Because I value people's opinions. I can learn who the most influential modern philosophers are, but I may miss someone who is not necessarily well known. I consider it 'consulting the experts' in a way.
  • dan0mac
    15
    I'll look them up. Thank you!
  • Antony Nickles
    1.1k

    I think the forefront of modern analytic philosophy (not discussing social topics) is Ordinary Language Philisophy, which was reacting to Positivism (among other things), first with Wittgenstein and then J.L. Austin's response to A.J. Ayer. The current proponent is Stanley Cavell, who is ground breaking in his methods of changing our perspectives, and the breadth of its application, though there are others, Cora Diamond, Mulhall. Try an essay from Must We Mean What We Say.
  • SophistiCat
    2.2k
    Well, this place may be slightly more expert than the general population, on average, but only slightly. There are hardly any professionals here, a few well-read dilettantes, but most aren't very knowledgeable.
  • bongo fury
    1.6k
    I consider it 'consulting the experts' in a way.dan0mac

    There are hardly any professionals here, a few well-read dilettantes,SophistiCat

    Well they did put scare quotes and say "in a way".
  • Rxspence
    80
    Philosophy
    the rules of debate
    Methods of reasoning
  • dan0mac
    15
    I love all of these responses- 'the only thing I know is I know nothing' etc. I've gotten exactly what I wanted- way too many books and authors to read. Thank you y'all so much, I'll get cracking!
  • dan0mac
    15
    I have noticed nowadays there is a very tangible intersection of anthropology/archaeology/philosophy I find very interesting
  • 180 Proof
    15.3k
    Some (indispensable yet underapprecated) 'moderns' in my canon:

    Peter Wessel Zapffe
    Emil Cioran
    Nelson Goodman
    Clément Rosset
    Philippa Foot
    Albert Murray
    Susan Haack
    David Schweickart
    David Deutsch
    Ray Brassier
    180 Proof
    Also ...

    Quentin Meillassoux
    R.S. Bakker
    Victor Stenger
    Walter Kaufmann
    Martha Nussbaum
    Thomas Metzinger
    Max Scheler (new to me!)
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.