How soon you've forgotten: the incorrigible misuse / abuse of intelligence, knowledge and/or judgment that inadvertently does harm for no gain or profit. That said, in the context of the original thread (linked by my user name), "stupid question" was merely a sarcastic descriptive; a more accurate adjective would've been "pseudo" rather than "stupid".What is your criterion for stupidity? — TheMadFool
What's a better candidate for an eternal thing and/or an uncaused cause, a physical universe or a god? My bet is on a god. — RogueAI
What are your thoughts in this? — Ash Abadear
How soon you've forgotten: the incorrigible misuse / abuse of intelligence, knowledge and/or judgment that inadvertently does harm for no gain or profit. That said, in the context of the original thread (linked by my user name), "stupid question" was merely sarcastic and seriously descriptive; a more accurate adjective would've been "pseudo" rather than "stupid" — 180 Proof
How soon you've forgotten: the incorrigible misuse / abuse of intelligence, knowledge and/or judgment that inadvertantly does harm for no gain or profit. That said, in the context of the original thread (linked by my user name), "stupid question" was merely sarcastic and seriously descriptive; a more accurate adjective would've been "pseudo" rather than "stupid". — 180 Proof
:roll: — 180 Proof
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.