I don't get this logic. How would one party acquire power if there are no parties? I'm going to need you to walk me through that in order to properly answer your question. — Harry Hindu
No. It seems like you are the one arguing forthe sake if arguing.. Be more specific. What is the subcategory that you are talking about? Corruption is what we were talking about, so what part of the link that I provided is about something other than corruption?Now you're just being a disagreeable. There was a discussion about the facts Michael used and you tried to waylay it with a subcategory of crimes, which is not possible because it's comparing apples with pears. — Benkei
This doesn't address how one party would come to power if there were no parties. You're moving the goalposts.Political parties are a consequence of freedom of association. US law does not recognize political parties as part of the governmental structure; they're just private groups of people pursuing the same political ends together. So I'm not clear what you want done to ban political parties, if not just banning people with similar political interests from working together toward those ends. — Pfhorrest
The problem is that the parties have adopted contradictory positions and there isn't any meaningful distinction between them. — Harry Hindu
For what? — NOS4A2
That’s what corrupt, immoral and unjust witch-hunters do, yes. — NOS4A2
So, what do you think? How long until he's in jail?
Trump launched his own cute little four page website: https://www.45office.com/ — praxis
"It was a huge election-time story that prompted cries of treason. But according to a newly disclosed assessment, Donald Trump might have been right to call it a “hoax.”" — NOS4A2
The article you linked said:Unfortunately it’s a dangerous game. Such hoax-worthy lies have brought the US and Russia that much closer to war. Skepticism of the story proved not only right, but prudent. — NOS4A2
Skepticism of the story proved not only right, but prudent. — NOS4A2
Unfortunately it’s a dangerous game. — NOS4A2
When they start rattling their sabres it should be doubted on principle. — NOS4A2
So, when it suits your bias, they are gold. When they don't, they are suspect. Got it.
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.