I look around society and I see a very unnatural state. For example, I see a drive to force almost against our will different segments of society, different groups, different biologies, different backgrounds, together in a way which, compared to a historical sense, seems very forced, engineered, calculated, planned and ultimately is unnatural in that historical sense. This what I would describe as a relentless drive to bind different people together, by using technology, has grave implications for the future of humanity, beyond simply a materialistic sense, which is what I think it is designed to do, for example, to lessen the social, cultural, biological differences between different peoples which have been created organically historically and thus might be considered to be true in the sense that, when left to simply time, a system, such as the arrangement of people into particular groups, patterns and structures, sorts itself out in a way which it likes most, whether because it is most efficient, or productive, or simply natural.

For example, do different racial groups exist because this is the most natural and logical state which has evolved over time, kind of like how bees create hexagons because they are the most efficient shape to create in the natural world since they use the least amount of energy. If you apply this to the history and evolution of humanity historically, then perhaps differences in race, societies, cultures do simply exist because they are the most logical to have evolved over time, outside of the new impinging force that is technology, particularly the way in which it is used in order to unnaturally weld, bind and blend these differences together, for mostly political and economic reasons within an arbitrarily created human system of governance that is new compared to those historically evolved differences.

So, when this technology is used to artificially eradicate such differences, this damages the completeness of those differences such that they become less and less different and more and more similar. This, I think, is unnatural for the human psyche to fathom and is a kind of jolt to the human experience of the world as a product of those historical differences. What, I think, this leads to is a conscious recognition in the human psyche of an impinging sense of unnaturalness that contradicts the very essence of human existence and a sense of erosion of personal choice and freedom that speaks to what it means to be human... So, I think technology can be thought of as a negative force in the sense that it is being used to push different societies together, which historically had a good, natural reason, to be separate.

Translated into day to day life, this might be observed as computer algorithms binding different ethnic groups together, or different cultures juxtaposed next to each other, in order to create a new kind of unnatural society where there is less originality but more commonality. This has many ethical implications which create the sense of unnaturalness but seem to be digested by the human psyche, almost like forcing a child to eat vegetables, in a state of stasis because the human psyche recognises the unnaturalness but has not yet challenged it. If these differences want to be bridged, they will do so naturally and gravitate towards each other without the intervention of a forceful technological structure that is disturbing the natural equilibrium of the system of natural difference.