↪jgill By computation do you mean reasoning?
Yes, I do mean that in a certain sense too. Do you suggest it is an example of reason and no computation? — kudos
Phenomenology compounds the Cartesian error by building up the barrier made between mind and world. — apokrisis
I don't think Peirce is so different from all those continental thinkers anyway — Gregory
Phenomenology has been developing since Kant. — Gregory
Peirce argued for the irreducible triadicity of a semiotic modelling relation and an expansion of that from a statement about epistemology to a story of ontic and cosmic generality. — apokrisis
The problem is the Cartesian monistic subject = the Peircean triadic model. If it's equivalent functionally, what does it matter? — schopenhauer1
The three choices are the monisms of materialism and idealism, the Cartesian dualism of two varieties of substantial being,, and then the trichotomies of any holistic or systems causality. — apokrisis
Is a Phenomenologist? - https://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/PHENOM.HTM
Note the Cartesian roots of phenomenology and its steady retreat into the primacy of subjectivity. Peirce argued for the irreducible triadicity of a semiotic modelling relation and an expansion of that from a statement about epistemology to a story of ontic and cosmic generality. — apokrisis
According to your author: — Joshs
Peirce maintains a notion of objects of experience as independent of the subject who does the experiencing. — Joshs
Philosophy professor and president of the CS Peirce Society vs some random angry dude on the internet. Gee, it’s tough to decide who to give greater credence to. — apokrisis
so yes, I think I’m more of an authority on Husserl than he is. But I don’t think credentials are the issue here. We should stick with the arguments. — Joshs
Do you think affectivity , which has become a major topic in psychology these days, plays an important role in the understanding of logic and rationality, and doe Perice accord an important place for it in his model? — Joshs
umwelt or private habits of interpretation. — apokrisis
Doesn’t this become constructivist woo just as wooey as any Cartesian subject? — schopenhauer1
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.