It's telling how readily 'expert' opinion is wielded and dropped depending on it's correlation with current social group ideology. Experts from public health tell you to mask and vaccinate - anyone who doesn't is an idiot. Experts from public health tell you that blaming the people themselves has no part in a public health response - fuck 'em, they don't know what they're talking about. — Isaac
Even if it were true that masking protected the unvaccinated (which it isn't - masking protects the vaccinated too, some 15-35% of whom will not be adequately protected by the vaccine they took), are we to similarly resent protection for other lifestyle choices? Should we rail against treating the ailments of smokers, the overweight, those who don't exercise enough, those whole eat too much bacon...? — Isaac
Precisely why I'm against vaccine passports. People make shit choices all the time. I have a stressful job and exercise too little. I'm even aware I should be doing more about the latter but don't give it priority. It's relatively stupid but it's not as if it makes me Satan. — Benkei
Be rational. Don't adhere to the irrational game of "let the rare exceptions dictate the general rule". This only results in more harm than good. — Roger Gregoire
That this kind of bullshit is one of the reasons why serious debate is next to impossible. Laymen weighing in with a superficial understanding of the science and no references or citations to back up their outlandish claims. — Isaac
Not once in your emotional rant did you refute my logic. -- can you? -- can you find a logical flaw in my words (other than just saying they are wrong)? — Roger Gregoire
I'm with Isaac on this one. It strikes me as extremely unlikely that a significant proportion of the viral load in the atmosphere would be removed by the lungs of people not wearing masks. I looked, but couldn't find evidence either way on the web. My conclusion - the scenario described in Roger Gregoire's post is unsupported unless he can provide evidence. This isn't a matter of "logic." It's a matter of fact. As far as I can see, RG has his facts wrong. — T Clark
The evidence for masks is lacking, but not so for the vaccines. — Hanover
You are suggesting that you are immune from the tribal mentality of the groups you describe and that you have figured out why I'm believing as I am. — Hanover
It might interest you to know that if a meeting is divided into an area with maskers and non-maskers, I'd most certainly be in the non-mask section. I also voted 100% Republican last election, except for the presidential race, which I abstained from. This is just to say that your psychoanalysis is incorrect, your grouping theory is incorrect — Hanover
I've also not suggested telling people they're idiots will help the situation, but I also don't think it will hurt. — Hanover
When did vaccinations participation become a "lifestyle choice"? I take lifestyle choices to be things like what we eat, our forms of recreation, and things that meaningfully affect our day to day lives. If you want to ride a motorcycle without a helmet to feel the wind through your hair and you ride to live and live to ride, that could be characterized as a lifestyle choice, even if it's extremely risky. Whether to spend 5 minutes getting a vaccine isn't a lifestyle choice. I'd call that "getting a vaccination." — Hanover
my question back to you is why do you single out the Covid vaccination as the single vaccine we can avoid and proclaim it's off limits, but as to measles and whooping cough you allow that we can impose these on our children? Why can't I proclaim those vaccines as "lifestyle choices" so that I can take those too outside the purview of societal control? — Hanover
If only the helmetless rider were insulated such that the consequences of his riding were his alone. Then he could cogently argue his "freedom." As to dangers, whatever danger the vaccine presents - and I am unaware of any danger the vaccine itself presents - it is less than miniscule against the real hazard of Covid and its ability to mutate and spread. — tim wood
The effect on other people. — tim wood
if I wear a mask and stand 6 feet away from you, and you wear a mask and stand 6 feet away from me, the chances that I'm going to get the virus from you or you from me is about zero. You have two things going for you. One, you have a mask, which is going to prohibit the virus' small droplets from travelling very far. And two, even if I didn't wear a mask and stand 6 feet away, the odds are also that you wouldn't get it.
With the corona virus making a comeback with the Delta variant and the struggle with misinformation.
Should we mandate mask wearing to the same degree as at least wearing a seat belt? And be fine if caught not wearing one. As well as make the corona vaccine mandatory for everyone?
Or should the public have the right to choose to wear a mask and vaccinate or not. Regardless of the risk of public safety?
Which should come first safety or freedom of choice?
At what point should we wait till we decide that safety takes precedence over freedom of choice?
12 hours ago
Consider a madman with a gun shooting up a neighborhood. What are your individual chances of being harmed? — tim wood
And of what value that? If both good, then both. — tim wood
Is it an exercise of freedom to increase rather then decrease the chances of that? Or is that again just stupidity? — tim wood
I shall take a lesson from published reports of people, sick with Covid or recovered from it, who wish to God they had gotten vaccinated. — tim wood
Now just wtf is your point? — tim wood
It strikes me as extremely unlikely that a significant proportion of the viral load in the atmosphere would be removed by the lungs of people not wearing masks. — T Clark
Can you now see the protective effects on our vulnerable population by unmasking our healthy vaccinated population? — Roger Gregoire
How exactly do you suppose that prevalence is kept low? — tim wood
The mechanism you describe seems very, very unlikely to me. I certainly won't accept it without evidence. — T Clark
Right. That always works. What need of law? What need of anything compulsory — tim wood
And of course such people know "exactly" who they are, by the numbers.
Do you yourself know such things? How do you know them? — tim wood
I don't see anywhere me claiming to be immune or objective. As for figuring out why you believe what you do, it wasn't my intention. The part of my post you're quoting here simply claims that you followed expert advice in one case where it tallied with a popular social identity and yet reject it in another where it does not. I haven't really gone as far as to assess why. — Isaac
Why? It takes five minutes to get a tattoo, but doing so is a lifestyle choice, so it's not the time. Why wouldn't getting a vaccine be a lifestyle choice? Not doing so certainly seems to be something people use to define themselves certainly no less than helmetless-biker, or solo-climber. You have faith in the medical establishment, you don't see it as a threat, so to you it's nothing. To others it defines them. That's the whole point. Your 'lifestyle choice' is that it's a nothing event. — Isaac
As I said in my response to Benkei above, the great thing about vaccinations as a public health response is exactly that we don't need everyone to take them for it to work. With measles is high (95%), with polio only 80%, with Covid it might be two thirds of the population to get the R0 to less than 1. Making a lifestyle choice to not have a vaccine is fine — Isaac
But, if more than 5 of you happen to choose not throw water on the fire, the 6+ of you can say "watching fires, not extinguishing fires, is my lifestyle choice, so stop being so judgey." — Hanover
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.