• thewonder
    1.4k
    So, I keep changing my mind on what should or should not be capitalized and wonder if I shouldn't just lowercase everything. I also feel fairly conflicted about hyphens. They seem to apply at different times to different philosophies.

    For instance:

    Neo-Freudianism
    nihilism
    Existentialism
    Anarcho-Pacifism
    anarcha-feminism
    Neo-Liberalism or neoliberalism
    Postmodernity or postmodernity
    etc, etc.

    I'm also confused as to how to write a maxim within the middle of a sentence.

    "Søren Kierkegaard is famous for the maxim, "Subjectivity is Truth.", which appears in Concluding Unscientific Postscript."

    Should there be a period there? I like to put it there, but it doesn't seem like it. Why have we capitalized "Subjectivity", then?

    It seems to make the most sense to lowercase everything and only hyphenate what are two distinct philosophies.

    For instance, "anarcho-communism" should be hyphenated, whereas "neoliberalism" should not. I'm still not sure what to do about my first example, though.

    I think that we can rule out "Neofreudianism" and "neoFreudianism". Should it be "Neo-Freudianism", "neo-Freudianism", "neo-freudianism", or "neofreudianism"?
    1. What is the proper spelling and capitalization of "Neo-Freudianism"? (2 votes)
        "Neo-Freudianism"
        50%
        "neo-Freudianism"
          0%
        "neo-freudianism"
          0%
        "neofreudianism"
        50%
  • thewonder
    1.4k
    I deleted this comment to make this all just one post.
  • Sir2u
    3.5k
    don't stress out, If you are not sure, google it.
  • Hanover
    12.9k
    also confused as to how to write a maxim within the middle of a sentence.

    "Søren Kierkegaard is famous for the maxim, "Subjectivity is Truth.", which appears in Concluding Unscientific Postscript.
    thewonder

    If leave out the period in the quote, but in the US, the comma goes inside the quote, not sure of other country's conventions.
  • thewonder
    1.4k

    Heh, I always leave the comma outside of the quote and I live in the US. I never really paid too much attention to the grammatical aspects of English classes, though. Clearly, the period shouldn't be there, but I just kind of like it for some reason.

    Assuming that we can place the comma outside of the quote and will eliminate the period, should it, then, be as follows:

    "Søren Kierkegaard is famous for the maxim, "subjectivity is Truth", which appears in Concluding Unscientific Postscript."

    Subjectivity was only capitalized because it was the first word of the sentence, whereas Kierkegaard, himself, who I am quoting, capitalized "Truth".

    Forgoing Kierkegaard's capitalization and just writing, "subjectivity is truth", seems to make the most sense to me. I don't like the comma on the inside and, so, will not change my way of writing them unless docked for doing so.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.