And necessity for. An sit, quid sit, quale sit. Is it? What is it, what kind of a thing is it? What are its special features?

Nothing is context/background free. No two separate things are the same thing, except as they may share abstract accidents or qualities, descriptors, those - or that - constituting the sameness, but at the same time being no part of the two things but a third thing. And discussion of the third thing no part of the first two.

What cannot be said, cannot be said. What cannot be spoken of, spoken of. What cannot be spoken of simply, accurately, with knowledge of, cannot & etc.

All this and more to be accounted before speaking (or writing), else the speaking/writing a display of ignorance. At the same time to engage with ignorance, beyond the laudable and honorable effort to educate, itself an exercise and display of ignorance.

Simplicity calls for the laying out and laying bare of the necessities, at least, for the discussion. At law called discovery, and undertaken because the need of it understood.

And all forms of argument fallacious except that from appropriate reason. So-and-so may have said, but how often on consulting and reading the citation do we find that the one citing either did not himself read, or reading did not understand, or that both reading and understanding, failed to see its irrelevancy That is, make the argument yourself, own it, with attribution as necessary - bespoke, not off-the-rack.

Before making an argument, point, or observation, gather and assemble the parts. It's not-so-easy even just to say what something is, or even if it is - and even this much an accomplishment. But lacking, only nonsense can result.

Gentle reader, to you I leave estimate of how much nonsense we endure in these pages. Simplicity - by no means itself simple or easy - a way to cut away at least some of the fat of nonsense, and who knows, maybe even a way to get to the meat of some good questions!

An sit, quid sit, quale sit. These not a bad start.