Think about this.
- Colossians 3:23-24. Whatever you do, work at it with your whole being, for the Lord and not for men, because you know that you will receive an inheritance from the Lord as your reward.
- Romans 2:6. God “will repay each one according to his deeds.”
- Deuteronomy 5:33. You must walk in all the ways that the LORD your God has commanded you, so that you may live and prosper and prolong your days in the land that you will possess. — gikehef947
Then, see the video. — gikehef947
Polytheism!!!Personally I doubt that any god gives a flyingf**k about who wins a football game nor which animal eats which other in the jungle. — Sir2u
How do you know that animals don't have souls? — gikehef947
You talk a lot from hearsay. — gikehef947
Nothing. All books were chosen as inspired words of God! — gikehef947
How can you make a statement like that? Do you have any proof that it is true? — Sir2u
I was not at the Council of Trent. Ask those who were there. If the telephone doesn't work, try psychophony. — gikehef947
and science — James Riley
It would be difficult to see a lion going up against a Nile crocodile. They must pray less than they do. Hippos, on the other hand, seem to raise their prayers to the Most High much more. Size does matter.2. where the cat kills the croc that has ventured onto land — James Riley
There is no such thing as "science", only sciences. For a mathematician, physics is not completely a science. Biology is not a science at all. Psychology is like voodoo. And sociology... what the fuck do sociologists do? — gikehef947
It would be difficult to see a lion going up against a Nile crocodile. They must pray less than they do. — gikehef947
You want me to fit into your schemes. — gikehef947
Popper was trying to define what the scientific method is all his life. In the end he came up with a definition that was not, which is the title of the last of his works: "Unended Quest". Unfortunately, any religious person could designate his practical life in the same way.P.S. Science is the scientific method. Sixth Grade, I think it was. — James Riley
The perspective that dominates us is human. It is unavoidable. When talking about the animal world, we distinguish between defensive strategies (such as those of the sloth) and aggressive ones (such as those of the leopard or killer whales). The Nazis (perhaps reading Nietzsche) applied the same optics to humanity. Morgan's canon. Herd morality and aristocratic morality. Prey and predators. And yet, I think my dog is good and wasps are not.How do we determine the religious affiliation of non-human animals? — Nils Loc
Popper was trying to define what the scientific method is all his life. — gikehef947
Too bad he didn't have my sixth grade teacher. Or better yet, Google. It's your friend. — James Riley
Popper was a very interesting person. A doctoral course with him was much better than a hundred books. Books do not answer simple questions. A dumb problem is a big problem until someone guides you. — gikehef947
What about polar bears? — gikehef947
I'll get back to you with that, if I can stop laughing long enough. — Sir2u
Think about it carefully. Why are the chosen people not ducks? — gikehef947
- Colossians 3:23-24. Whatever you do, work at it with your whole being, for the Lord and not for men, because you know that you will receive an inheritance from the Lord as your reward. — gikehef947
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.