How many times have climate alarmists been right? One day, I guess. — NOS4A2
OK, then I'm not sure what you think could have been achieved in decades that took a couple of centuries. — Janus
They’re also known as ‘warmists’. You know, people who run around scaring the populace with nonsense about climate change. — Wayfarer
Can you go a bit deeper into this inertia concept? Does it have anything to do with our nature? What could explain it? People seem to take lots and lots of convincing before they decide to not accept but just to merely consider a point of view. I've experienced this myself - it takes a huge amount of effort just to get heard, forget about changing people's minds. — TheMadFool
What I was referring to was not rational assent. Many people accept the reality of anthropogenically induced, or at least enhanced, climate change. What to do about it, including accepting a fairly drastic reduction in one's prosperity, comfort and convenience is the real stumbling block. The fact is that really significant change needs to be mandated by governments, but again the problem is getting any government that proposed such radical changes voted in, and then voted in again and again for a sufficient series of terms to effect the needed changes. — Janus
That's the way people seem to be; does it matter whether it has "anything to do with our nature"? The important question would be whether we can find a way to work around this inertia before it's too late. Your question reminds me of the Buddhist story about the person who has been shot with a poison arrow wanting to know what kind of poison it was, what kind of wood was the bow and arrow made from, who made the bow and arrow and so on, before consenting to treatment. — Janus
If an all-knowing, all-powerful, all-good being was on your side in a battle, wouldn't it be silly to question faer commands? Of course, assuming such a being exists. — TheMadFool
Do the majority of scientists agree that climate change is the "the issue of our time"? I would be interested in seeing a study. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you.In my opinion, I think it's undeniable that this is the issue of our time and those of us who aren't in denial should at least put it in their top 3 political priorities and act accordingly. — Xtrix
I don't believe most people want to take responsibility. — Yohan
The plutocracy is very small compared to the majority, yet they rule. Their power isn't based on money, but deception of the masses. They convinced the majority to sell their soul's to paper. To work in servitude in quiet desperation to corporations. The same corporations that rule the government which they convince us is there to "protect our freedom"(rights).Part of the problem is that taking responsibility can work at cross-purposes to your goal. If I save a gallon of gas, I increase the supply, which lowers the price, which stimulates demand, and allows other to roll coal while I walk. It's like the guy who wants to take our Saddam Husain taking his deer rifle, boarding a plane to Bagdad and trying to hunt him down on his own. Is he a hypocrite for not doing so? No. It's just smart to have solidarity on some issues. It takes all of us to build an interstate highway system.
So it's no wonder people want to be lead. We just have leaders that are owned by the Plutocracy. — James Riley
I don't know what will help, but I know flippancy won't. — Janus
Flippancy is just one step shy of the nest step, which is "looking at the bright side." — James Riley
One wag opined that in the future (if not now) we will be resigned to aligning ourselves with the Plutocracy or Cartels, both of which rely upon each other to foment the preoccupation, division, distraction and lack of solidarity by using each other as a foil, while maintaining government as a punching bag for the people. — James Riley
Solidarity of the people seems to be a distant fast-vanishing dream. — Janus
Do the majority of scientists agree that climate change is the "the issue of our time"? — Yohan
I hear about climate change now and again. I'm surprised I don't hear about it all the time in the news. Who is to blame that this issue is not given more attention? — Yohan
Why has Bill Gates been more concerned about viruses? — Yohan
I don't think its necessarily easy, especially for us laymen to determine what is the most important issue of our time. — Yohan
Climate change is an existential threat. Like nuclear weapons. That should make it pretty high on our priority list. — Xtrix
But I have often wanted to sit down and ask him and his wife (X?) how philanthropy doesn't work at cross-purposes: Doesn't education and helping people result in an increase of their foot print on the planet? One American costs more than a thousand starving people in X country. If will pull them up and cause a reduction in their reproduction/population, isn't that offset by their increasing foot print? Anyway, I digress.
As to other "pressing issues", one might argue that worrying about those other issues is spending a dollar chasing a dime. When your house is burning down, you might want to work on that first. Of what avail is equal wealth distribution, peace, solidarity, accountability, food and water, if you don't have a place to enjoy all that in? They aren't much good in a post-apocalyptical hell-scape. — James Riley
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.