• Manuel
    4.3k


    Some of the were bullied. But some likely weren't. Not that you said otherwise. It's very complex, many factors involved, not least the kind of economic system we have of massive consumerism and try-and-you-get-it-all what with all these social media devices constantly engaging in non-stop competition and then you're not good enough and If I'm not good enough the others aren't either. Something like that. But many other factors we aren't privy to as well.

    what is a phase (gothing out in black, piercing, etc.) and what is some real serious mental issues. Either way, I know it cannot help to have a pack engaged in dog-pilling on these kids. I hate packs. Even if the loner is an asshole who deserves to be ostracized. I like people who befriend the lonely who don't want to be alone, as well as those who stand up to the pack when they see them bullying.James Riley

    I can agree with that. Well, in a philosophy forum of all places, you're going to find a few pessimists. This is kind of the whole range of human thought, much of it inscrutable to us.

    I'm similar-ish to you. Mine is more noise-reduction than anything else. My mind needs space to think, even if lots of the time it's navel-gazing. If I don't have that, I'm not living fully. Call it a quirk. :wink:
  • James Riley
    2.9k
    Mine is more noise-reduction than anything else.Manuel

    It's a noisy world and it's good to disconnect. For me, it's reconnecting with the non-human environment that brings the peace.
  • Manuel
    4.3k
    For me, it's reconnecting with the non-human environment that brings the peace.James Riley

    That's good too.
  • hypericin
    1.9k
    No.

    And the distinction is moot, since I was clearly talking about loners, not merely the state of being alone.

    A loner, by choice or otherwise, spends less time with other people than the norm. You, the self appointed arbiter of human merit, deems them to be failures. Good on you. I think you are a self important blowhard, but we each have our opinions.
  • Deleted User
    0
    This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.
  • hypericin
    1.9k
    I do insist on such a definition. A loner voluntarily prefers solitude, for reasons you might consider healthy, unhealthy, and every gradation between. Where involuntary, "outcast" is more apt.

    This is the denotation. Alongside this, there is a negative connotation of disapproval, distrust, and contempt. To call someone a loner is not to make a psychological diagnosis as you seem to believe. Rather, the word, beyond its denotation, is an act of social judgement. So far from understanding this distinction, you uncritically accept the social attitude as a given, reifying it as merely a reflection of the loner's failure and unhealth.

    It is one of the roles of philosophy to disentangle these false "givens" from what is neutrally there. It is the role of junk philosophy to accept and bolster social consensus with half assed references to Aristotle and "Rogerian self actualization"
  • Deleted User
    0
    This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.
  • hypericin
    1.9k
    Please try to read more carefully. I was contrasting "loner", whose condition is voluntary, with an "outcast" whose isn't.

    But I take your point, by definition no loners are in any pathological statetim wood
    I hope to avoid ever making such a ridiculous claim. Loners prefer to be alone, that is really all there is to it.

    And you attribute to me a characterizations I did not and do not make. It being not mine, the "contempt," & etc. must be yours.tim wood
    These are my takes on the connotations of the word. I think most would agree, at least in my (American South) culture. It is quite hard to believe someone hasn't internalized these connotations who makes the the whopper of a claim that:

    I do not think there is any such thing as a "successful" loner. To be a loner is already to have failed at life in perhaps the most significant waystim wood

    Guess I'm just being defensive.

    From this I infer - no doubt incorrectly - that you're something of a loner, and a bit afraid of it, certainly defensive.tim wood

    I happily claim to be something of a loner, though I go through phases. There were times people might have called me one behind my back (it is not something you say to someone's face, unless you intend to denigrate).
  • Deleted User
    0
    This user has been deleted and all their posts removed.
12Next
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.