Sounds interesting!Precisely! — GraveItty
A thought or two.You cannot judge a sculpture based on a photo. Best to touch it. — Olivier5
Yeah, I was reading others' posts in response to your post to me "there is clearly something wrong with her". I got your reference point without missing a beat. But then I read the others' responses -- humor jumped on them, I guess.↪TheMadFool
The professor, obviously. The mona lisa is just fine — Bartricks
Yet she loved Piet Mondrian's Apple Tree in Bloom or Flowering Apple Tree. (I do too) — Caldwell
If you love the flowers in the garden, are you also in love with them? — Caldwell
Doesn't saying you're in love with something or someone or some appearance or whatever just mean the same as saying that you love that person, or thing, or appearance, or whatever? — Bartricks
You can also judge a pudding by its look. However, the real proof of the pudding is in the eating.1) Of course I can. Why can I not? — tim wood
Yes, you cannot touch those of course, too old and fragile. But to come back to contemporary artists like Rodin or Maillol, you can touch their bronzes without posing any risk to their work.the Riaci bronzes — tim wood
I don't find it attractive. — Tom Storm
Beauty is the perfection or near perfection of form and function. — boagie
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.