243012770_1310505819406426_3879163455009871205_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=110474&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_eui2=AeEVEHidSEdvxR3EWqD7WIJHte2dD0oZNIC17Z0PShk0gPcKFJIhESxJcphu9Wz8100&_nc_ohc=gyAI3_QzvfcAX-TY4FT&_nc_ht=scontent.fmid3-1.fna&oh=58c08d5d8d717355094ac0e9fd415718&oe=617B1780 — The Opposite
Nice article, explaining simply the inevitable result of our Tory Brexit. — Punshhh
Well, they were not so incompetent to lose the elections. Which likely they can thank the opposition.I do think though that there we’re issues with high rates of immigration between 2004 and 2016 and this made it easy for UKIP to employ xenophobia. However there were solutions to this issue without leaving the EU, but it would require competent government to achieve it. Tory incompetence wasn’t up to the job. — Punshhh
a political equivalent of a tax loss — unenlightened
what if the UK gets proportional representation? — The Opposite
Is it because Starmer is more centrist? — The Opposite
Prioritise the qualities of the candidate over the policies of the party. — unenlightened
I have always found it shocking that in the US ‘candidates’ can just use empty rhetoric without even the slightest attempt to show any plans or implementation of said plans. — I like sushi
I think willfully siding with a system that looks towards popularism rather than policies (which is at its heart what you are suggesting) is a wrong turn. — I like sushi
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.