Sample X:

In the mathematically rigorous formulation of quantum mechanics, the state of a quantum mechanical system is a vector ${\displaystyle \psi }$ belonging to a (separable) complex Hilbert space ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {H}}}.$ This vector is postulated to be normalized under the Hilbert space inner product, that is, it obeys ${\displaystyle \langle \psi ,\psi \rangle =1}$, and it is well-defined up to a complex number of modulus 1 (the global phase), that is, ${\displaystyle \psi }$ and ${\displaystyle e^{i\alpha }\psi }$ represent the same physical system. In other words, the possible states are points in the projective space of a Hilbert space, usually called the complex projective space. The exact nature of this Hilbert space is dependent on the system – for example, for describing position and momentum the Hilbert space is the space of complex square-integrable functions ${\displaystyle L^{2}(\mathbb {C} )}$, while the Hilbert space for the spin of a single proton is simply the space of two-dimensional complex vectors ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{2}}$ with the usual inner product. — Wikipedia (Quantum Physics)

Sample Y:

To be, or to takes, when we have, the slings and their currents turn awry, and lose the mind to sleep to sleep of death what dream: ay, the question: whether bear the mind to sleep; to suffer the name of office, and them? To die: to sleep; no more; and enterprises of great pith a bare bodkin? Who would bear the oppressor's wrong, the heart-ache and scorns of great pith a bare bodkin? — thinkzone.wlonk.com (Gibberish generator)

First things first, not many will get the point I'm trying to get across since many forum members seem educated enough to see the sense in sample X. Speaking for myself, reading sample X gives me a headache; simply put nec caput, nec pedes. I'll have to make myself the test subject.

Turning to sample Y, this too is all Greek to me but note that it's authentic gibberish (the algorithm that generated it claims so).

Sample X (not gibberish) is identical to sample Y (gibberish) with respect to my comprehension ability (both are incomprhensible).

In a sense then, (high levels of) abstraction = gibberish!

Questions:

1. Is there such a thing as gibberish or nonsense? You could be like me, reading/listening to something far more complex and abstract than your mind can handle.

The other side of the coin,

2. Are abstractions, the kind you see in math, physics, philosophy and other intellectual disciplines, inherently meaningless gibberish?