That's the experiment. — thaumasnot
Don't tell me you don't know that in abstract painting most trees stand vertical and their leaves are convex. Same for realistic work. Vertical, up-down linearly, convex, spherical. — Raymond
Could we discover elements the artist wasn't aware of? — Raymond
New pattern seems to "click" into existence somehow. What pieces of sound are objective properties? — Raymond
What pieces of sound are objective properties? — Raymond
What you mean by medium specific narrative? — Raymond
The mosaic is predisposed to distract from the content, as if through centrifugal force. Reviewing is known to relate to the content in the following ways:
* Description for the blind or deaf (for example, enumerating the instruments in a musical piece, or, if there’s a tree in a painting, saying, with style, that there’s a tree)
* Analysis “through the microscope”, that is, features of the mosaic are individually looked at in detail (for example, the rhyming structure of a poem, or the references and historical context of a painting)
* Myopic overviews, mostly in the form of categorizations (for example, categorizing a Beethoven piece as Romantic-era classical music) — thaumasnot
But who determines what parts of the piece are mosaic parts? — Raymond
The work that is conceptually reconstructed has to be looked at in an a priori defined manner. Somehow, your theory reminds me of the scientific approach to reality, where empiricism plays a role. — Raymond
I will try to come up with a narrative for a painting. The narrative, by definition, has to be spoken or written or spoken. Or can we give a visual narrative of music, and a sound narrative of a painting? — Raymond
Don't tell me you don't know that in abstract painting most trees stand vertical and their leaves are convex. Same for realistic work. Vertical, up-down linearly, convex, spherical. — Raymond
don't know their significance, why we should be paying attention to them. — T Clark
Yes, I know what the words mean, but not in the context they are being used. I don't know their significance, why we should be paying attention to them. — T Clark
The painting is conceptually reconstructed — Raymond
The music is “quoted” and a correlation (the repetititon) is noted. What is not objective for you here ? — thaumasnot
So I don't think you should represent this style of interpretation as any more objective than any other style. It is a different style, but there appears to be nothing in your principles which would make it objective. — Metaphysician Undercover
Works are reconstructed in objective, constructive terms — thaumasnot
What’s objective is the quoted content and the correlations. — thaumasnot
I\m trying to grasp what the point to this style of interpretation is. It's a complex system without any real value scheme. Doesn't that leave it worthless? See if you can answer this question for me. What is the overarching goal behind this reconstruction system? Is the goal to produce good quality interpretations, as reconstructions, or is the goal to produce a complex formal system of interpretation? — Metaphysician Undercover
Take a look at it this way for example. There is a relationship between any particular reconstruction and the original piece which is chosen. Is that a relationship of value? — Metaphysician Undercover
-Two black lines, one vertically, Man, one antivertically, Woman.
-Woman and Man shake the boundaries. The house containing them ain't big enough for the both of them.
-Man and Woman push each other into the corner, mutually orthogonal.
-Convexity is absent. — Raymond
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.