For if the light of reason uncovers disturbing truths, one solution is to turn off that light. — Art48
For if the light of reason uncovers disturbing truths, one solution is to turn off that light — Art48
On the personal level, I am an infinitesimal speck of matter in an unimaginably vast universe, existing for less than a microsecond compared to the lifetime of a star. If I lack a deep self or my deep self doesn’t survive death, then my existence seems as ephemeral as a water fountain’s spray, as meaningless as a soap bubble. — Art48
the continued search for truth. — Art48
But existing religions disagree and use an inferior way of knowing that often leads to untruth; such religions serve State but not necessarily truth. — Art48
I don’t find the apologist arguments I’ve seen (for example, William Lane Craig) convincing. Apologists IMHO embrace reason only in so far as it supports dogma. — Art48
By truth I mean correspondence with reality. — Art48
The intelligent design argument is an example of using reason only in so far as it supports dogma. If God designed the universe so that conscious life can exist, then God also designed the universe so that childhood cancer could exist. — Art48
Did they see these thoughts as forming a wall, a barrier? — Art48
Why would the size of the universe or the duration of a star be seen 'a barrier'? — Olivier5
At weekly meetings, refugees from reason gather and reaffirm their reason-denying beliefs. — Art48
Since the moment that our lives are limited we tend to see everything with limitations in terms of time, age, ability, understanding, etc...
It can affect us because it shows how weak we are towards universe.
For example: "A trip to Pluto takes 35 years of our life" it is literally a barrier of our capacities and nobody can pursue the trip yet. — javi2541997
Religions use an inferior way of knowing - faith and authority – and so cannot agree. Christianity can’t even agree on how to be saved. And religion has dogma, which cannot be rejected.
Science uses a better way of knowing – loosely called the scientific method. Science converges to reality. Scientists throughout the world accept the sciences of chemistry, biology, etc. while religions have had thousands of years to converge, but haven’t. Ask a Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist what happens after death and you’ll get contradictory answers. — Art48
Shouldn't truth answer all of the questions rather than being limited to reality?By truth I mean correspondence with reality. — Art48
Conclusion: we are weak whatever we are compared with! — javi2541997
An individual human can be very very strong indeed both mentally and physically. — universeness
Oh boy, you have a very optimistic view of humans. I don't feel myself more powerful than a pigeon since the moment when I have issues as depression or existentialism. These states of mind can induce some persons to commit suicide. So... in this context, a pigeon is more powerful than me at least emotionally — javi2541997
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.