You don't understand?
— chiknsld
Please refrain from ad hominems. — Jackson
Motion one-way. We can call time the measurement of motion or time is what clocks measure. Time is used as a human convenience. A measurement--hours, minutes. Time is so flexible; it changes from country to country. So do you call a measurement an existent? — val p miranda
I think that there can be only one immaterial and that is space. — val p miranda
That measurement can be made in different units, maybe hours, etc. So one serious trouble with time and space is that it is discussed without a correct definition: time is the measurement of motion and space is a real immaterial that makes mass, etc. possible. — val p miranda
Therefore if object does not move there is no time for that object?Movement does not require time; movement creates time. — val p miranda
Therefore if object does not move there is no time for that object?
don't objects age over time because they are subject to time? — SpaceDweller
It is accurate in my opinion to say that movement and time are entwined but they are still relative — universeness
So movement and time are entwined but if movement reaches light speed then the time aspect stops — universeness
time is the measurement of motion and space is a real immaterial... — val p miranda
Proper time though is no relative notion. Neither is proper length. — Haglund
Proper time and proper length are therefore relative notions used in special relativity — universeness
No. They are frame independent. Everyone agrees on proper time and length. It's the rate of the clock in the rest frame. That's the same for all observers. Like the proper length — Haglund
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.