life might be wonderful....having to deal with superstitions in 2022 isn't that great. — Nickolasgaspar
On the contrary! Im far ahead of my time. Already at 35! The world isnt ready yet. But my writings will soon be read in the whole world, Nobel prizes for physics and literature and maybe for peace will come my way. You gotta have a goal in life! — Hillary
Don't worry! But yes, I guess you have to deal with... But you could also just accept the gods as a given... — Hillary
lol....that is not what Hillary means by the term agency....Agency in Physics
Carlo Rovelli — jgill
that is not what Hillary means by the term agency.... — Nickolasgaspar
nothing he says has to do with your "agencies" thought. He is addressing physical mechanisms. — Nickolasgaspar
Charge is agent...not a thinking agent...not a god. — Nickolasgaspar
-Why are you attacking a strawman? Math is just a tool we have to describe relations, differences, analogies and equations between properties and systems in nature. Why would you ever assume that math have a "real existence" lol.The math that's used in the description of nature has no real existence but the stuff it describes certainly has. — Hillary
No heaven has ever been verified...so its irrational to introduce it in an argument as a premise. — Nickolasgaspar
Again no divine stuff has ever be demonstrated, — Nickolasgaspar
Only if you prove the above unfalsifiable claims you can conclude to magical agents — Nickolasgaspar
An other unfounded assumption... You are officially guilty for "practicing" the Philosophy of Absuridism. — Nickolasgaspar
You keep telling us what you believe but you fail to demonstrate good reasons on why you do. — Nickolasgaspar
Why are you attacking a strawman? Math is just a tool we have to describe relations, differences, analogies and equations between properties and systems in nature. Why would you ever assume that math have a "real existence" lol. — Nickolasgaspar
-". Tell me, what is charge? "
-Not part of this conversation — Nickolasgaspar
- There is this thing call logic......The question is: why does heaven need verification in the first place? For me it doesn't. — Hillary
There is this thing call logic... — Nickolasgaspar
Why did you demanded from me to verify my claim "women are inferior to men''? — Nickolasgaspar
No the stuff around me and the stuff I am made of...is stuff.It's the stuff around you and the stuff you're made of. — Hillary
-Of course it is...if you want to do philosophy, to produce Wise claims you will need Valid and Sound arguments..not unwarranted assumptions.Again, there is no need to proof, verify, or give evidence. Only in the scientific investigation of the material world this is of importance. — Hillary
-No it isn't...and since you are an "inferior woman" my opinion is the correct one (again see how your reasoning works?).Absurdism is a great philosophy, absurdly as that may sound. If I'm guilty of practising it, then that only is in my advantage. — Hillary
-You assume that existence has a reason...you need to demonstrate that not just assume it. If not then you are proposing an irrational assumption.The reasons are obvious. To give a reason for existence. How rational can one get? — Hillary
Tegmark is a mathematician....what did you expect? Hawking was a "poet, its not fair to accuse him for that.I don't assume that, but scientists like Tegmark or Hawking do. Hawking even thinks God is a mathematician. — Hillary
-Not interested in what you believe...only in what you can demonstrate as sound...Which some of them are, and it can be argued that some of them, being members of the human god species, played a wicked role in creation. — Hillary
No it isn't. We are talking about non natural agents and how you can demonstrate believing in them to be a reasonable act.It is, as we talk about agency, and charge is an agent. — Hillary
I can make the same claim and say that your argument about heaven is not just irrational, but wrong since for me the claim "heaven doesn't exist" doesn't need justification. — Nickolasgaspar
No you don't....I do! You can't know the truth because you are an inferior human being! How can that is possible?Indeed, you can! I'm not saying I know the truth for you. — Hillary
Truth is an evaluation terms we use on claims that are in agreement with facts.
You admit it yourself you can not provide proof for your claims. So you can not claim that you know the truth.
YOu accept claims as true to ease your existential and epistemic anxieties...that's all. — Nickolasgaspar
you sound like an amateur tennis player bragging on how good she is but when I challenge your claim and offer you a racket and a ball ...you answer is "I don't play tennis with a racket and a ball or a net". — Nickolasgaspar
That is irrelevant...You can only make those evaluations based on the available facts not on facts you don't have or might not exist....lolBut there are more facts than the ones about the material world we live in and even when we limit ourselves to the material world, there are conflicting views on how reality truly looks like. — Hillary
The problem is that your racket and ball only share the same label and nothing else, plus you keep denying the use of the net and lines.....The point is, I would love to play tennis with you. I have my own racket and balls though. A magic racket and magic balls. You would be tired and ask for mercy... Or blame the arbiter. "The ball was OUT!!!" — Hillary
The problem is that your racket and ball only share the same label and nothing else, plus you keep denying the use of the net and lines.....
1m — Nickolasgaspar
iron age heuristics — Nickolasgaspar
-The only rackets that are relevant are those conforming to the rules of logic. Your metaphysics need to originate from a sound starting point...not an assumption that you don't care to demonstrate.Concerning the theological play, there are many different rackets to play with just the same. But you play with no racket at all. Which is admirable, but I won't challenge you in that case, as thats unfair. — Hillary
-identifying logical fallacies is not your strong point...right?iron age heuristics — Nickolasgaspar
:fire:
Excellent point! No offense Hillary.
Argumentum ad novitatem? — Agent Smith
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.