Women are more necessary in biological terms than men. So, they somehow have to have more chance of survival. Reason being that a woman can have 1 child in a year, while a man can have more than 1. So, women are more important for survival of the human species. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
Evolution itself is not intelligent — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
Is the most coherent conclusion that we have to just "Live at war" indefinitely? — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
politicians use this complot to reach votes. — javi2541997
it is a topic that in the future would lose some credibility among the society — javi2541997
What do you exactly mean? — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
What does feminism stands for? How worthy is it? — javi2541997
Is the most coherent conclusion that we have to just "Live at war" indefinitely? — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
it is hard to bring a lovely conclusion out of this. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
Mass suicide.If men wanted to, they could enslave women.
I know it reads really extreme. But it’s the truth. Men could do it, they just don’t.
So, if women are biologically more important than men, but men are stronger and could override that women superiority,
What is the most coherent way to conclude this? — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
Should individuals live "at war" with each other in pursuit of a goal that they hold no stake in nor any influence over? — Tzeentch
Mass suicide. — L'éléphant
Then that would be the men's decision. They're the ones who decide what's sustainable long term. And so we find ourselves in this reality that we're in now.I must admit I'm biased to a more sustainable option. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
I think you are trying to tergiversate the main point of the conversation. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
Wouldn't it be revelant to your logically coherent conclusion that individuals in the way you describe them are not acting rationally? — Tzeentch
Women are more necessary in biological terms than men. So, they somehow have to have more chance of survival. Reason being that a woman can have 1 child in a year, while a man can have more than 1. So, women are more important for survival of the human species. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
This would be true if humanity faced an extinction, but this is far from being the case. — SpaceDweller
The thing is that nature does not distinguish very well between having an extinction or not. Evolution itself is not intelligent — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
male is supposed to protect female during that 9 months period. — SpaceDweller
your point is — SpaceDweller
Yes but that does not imply that a man cannot copulate with other women during that period. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
other females may already be conceived by other males — SpaceDweller
What is the most coherent way to conclude this? — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
If men wanted to, they could enslave women.
I know it reads really extreme. But it’s the truth. Men could do it, they just don’t. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
Women are more necessary in biological terms than men — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
How so? The gentlemen produce the sperm. Just as necessary, if you don't mind me saying. Without sperm, no egg can be awakened. — Hillary
Reason being that a woman can have 1 child in a year, while a man can have more than 1. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
How many babies can one man have in one year? Approximately 365. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
A man can have 365 babies per year? With 365 women? He can impregnate all woman in the world in two months! — Hillary
I was going to say the same thing -- their wives wouldn't let them. — Moses
Yes.
I don't know why you are omitting the point — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
What do I omit? — Hillary
I genuinely love to debate, I believe it's one of the most delicious things on earth (after sex) but I will not debate something that has been so well argued. So I will not reply again about it. — ithinkthereforeidontgiveaf
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.