Why you want to measure gods?
— Hillary
I don't know. This is what I should ask you: why do you want to measure gods? — javi2541997
Actual existent is not the same as measurable. — Hillary
. If you want proof that bad, you can open your hart to them. And let them in. At least, the knowledge that they exist. Or you can look in quantum mechanical experiments. — Hillary
I think you have very good arguments and a well refutation, but sadly, you end up defending God not matter the context or circumstances and that's weak — javi2541997
Pessimism and nihilistic context is more comfortable — javi2541997
knucklehead tennis match taking up most of this thread.
So, the question is, what could 'existence is a perfection mean'? Especially consider the manifestly imperfect nature of existence as we know it. — Wayfarer
Leaving aside the inane suggestion regarding extraterrestrials, there is an interesting point about Anselm's ontological argument that I feel is often not noticed or made explicit. — Wayfarer
Quantum gravity' rings any bells? — 180 Proof
Tunneling from a false vacuum — 180 Proof
This statement is incoherent. Spacetime is emergent and "the question of where from" assumes space. — 180 Proof
Didn't you like our excited debate? — javi2541997
Kurt Gödel, no less, was convinced there was something to the ontological argument. He, I was led to understand, developed his own version of it. Google for more! — Agent Smith
String theory vs angels on the head of a pin. What a waste of the digital resources. :roll: — jgill
This thread is like a time travel back to the scholasticism of the 13th century using quantum theory to revive that ancient nonsense. String theory vs angels on the head of a pin. What a waste of the digital resources — jgill
But, you are right, this thread is indeed a waste of electrons, over and out. — Wayfarer
Nowadays the debate is about the meaning of super-position and how the same particle can be in two places at once. — Wayfarer
In future there will probably be scathing references to string theory as an example of the degenerate nature of 21st c physics — Wayfarer
A great math guy but something of a nut case toward the end.
This thread is like a time travel back to the scholasticism of the 13th century using quantum theory to revive that ancient nonsense. String theory vs angels on the head of a pin. What a waste of the digital resources. :roll: — jgill
There's a thin line between genius and insanity. — Oscar Levant
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.