. I am not impressed nor do I now feel an imperative to draw you a picture of a mindless spark! — universeness
If moving you see the mindless spark before your nose. Its still with us in the vacuum. Energy fluctuating all over space — Frankly
Thanks for the clrifications as to energy and existence. It seems to me you've adopted the method of Fetcher over that of the romantics by arguing from science to philosophy. Also, aren't you arguing from time and what is done in time to an eternalism that is foreign to our senses? — Gregory
So, I think that the world is spiritual but 1) science can't say anything about spirituality, and 2) a materialist viewpoint is self consistent but incomplete. All that exists is this world, matter is real, and matter and the spirit are identical. Are you open to these ideas? I see the world and know it's just as I see it (objectively), but paradoxically I don't know what it is yet. Not until I complete my life on earth will I know full reality. Maybe a materialistic spirituality is possible! — Gregory
It's unwise not to adopt that view, but we must keep trying and looking for verifications in reality — val p miranda
Look at a donut hole. Think about what you can't remember. — 180 Proof
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.