• KantDane21
    47
    I have always thought is something is metaphysically contingent is simply means that something, a state of affairs, MAY be the case. Tomorrow I may stub my foot on a nail and feel pain. This happening is metaphysically contingent. It is not a fortiori possible.
    However, I am reading (or attempting to) read a paper by Braddon-Mitchel now, and he talks of "no-futurism", "eternalism" and all these other concepts in relation to metaphysical contingency, and, to be frank, I am confused.
  • Jackson
    1.8k


    If you post a specific text then others might be able to comment.
  • KantDane21
    47
    cheers, this one here: David Baddon-Mitchell, David. 2004. « How do we know it is now now? » Analysis 64 (283): 199–203....
    it is one of the key concepts he frequently refers to... thanks!
  • Agent Smith
    9.5k
    Metaphysically contingent: Dependent on metaphysical concepts/entities for some property/quality/feature in part/as a whole.

    Murder, essentially a causal argument, is metaphysically contingent on causality.

    My two cents!
  • jgill
    3.8k
    The word metaphysical itself is ill-defined. This is a step further into the void.
  • Agent Smith
    9.5k
    The word metaphysical itself is ill-defined. This is a step further into the void. — jgill

    :snicker:
  • Cuthbert
    1.1k
    How do we know it is now now?KantDane21

    Because when you misbehave in class the teacher says: "Now, now!" It's a simple matter of classroom discipline. Some teachers say "Now, then!", but their theory is quite incoherent in my view.
  • Relativist
    2.5k
    I have always thought is something is metaphysically contingent is simply means that something, a state of affairs, MAY be the case.KantDane21
    That's right. More precisely: x is metahysically contingent = possibly*(x) &possibly*(~x)

    *referring to metaphysical possibility = actual possibility, not merely epistemically possible or conceptually possible


    Tomorrow I may stub my foot on a nail and feel pain.
    It depends: does the universe evolve deterministically? If yes, then there is exactly one metaphysically possible outcome. We're ignorant of the future, so we don't know which, but this entails epistemic possibility, not metaphysical possibility.
  • charles ferraro
    369


    Absent a Deus ex machina, personal existence is experientially contingent because it does not have to be.
  • Banno
    24.8k
    Because when you misbehave in class the teacher says: "Now, now!" It's a simple matter of classroom discipline. Some teachers say "Now, then!", but their theory is quite incoherent in my view.Cuthbert

    That sort of argument is for recalcitrants. Before then, an effective teacher will have used The Eye. Under that unyielding gaze the more amenable students will develop an effective understanding of both The Now and The Other.
  • magritte
    553
    D.B-M said,
    I argue that on the growing salami view, it is almost certainly not
    now. It is not now now; or less tendentiously, the current time is probably
    not the present
  • magritte
    553
    The word metaphysical itself is ill-defined. This is a step further into the void.jgill

    It is. But that's the fault of people who insist on using ill-defined fundamental concepts in a perverse manner to confuse themselves.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.