One thing I totally hate about the interface of this forum is that there's no adequate text editor. I can't centre text, can't wrap text around images, use different fonts, change font size, etc. It would make communicating stuff more interesting if we had a Word document kind of interface which gave you full flexibility. — Agustino
Ok, understood. Formatting and style though is a means of communication too, and as such, it is a writer's concern. One of the things that I think has brought philosophy down in the past is that the content is there, but the FORM isn't used to reflect and support it as effectively as possible.Formatting and style is not the writer's concern. — jamalrob
Ok, understood. Formatting and style though is a means of communication too, and as such, it is a writer's concern. One of the things that I think has brought philosophy down in the past is that the content is there, but the FORM isn't used to reflect and support it as effectively as possible. — Agustino
Why not? You are aware that most forums have word processors for posts right (at least the other non-philosophy forums I've been on do, and I remember you could change colors, etc. in old PF too)? Of course on a random web page you don't want people to change the font, etc. of what's already on the page, that would be insane and mess the layout. But a post would live in its own div, you should be able to play with the layout inside as much as you want.And I can't get over the fact that you work in web development and yet you think it's cool for users to be able to change the font and text colour — jamalrob
A lot of developers don't pay adequate attention to graphic + typographic design, but I don't understand why not. These are essential elements that should be incorporated and thought out in each design. Most people just stick Montserrat or Roboto with 2 lines of code and then forget about fonts, but that's the wrong approach. The right font + the right graphic design significantly increases conversions, and most clients don't want websites just to look cool, or work cool - they want them to sell for them. — Agustino
For web pages, not for the content inside posts. If I post something I should be able to decide if it's green or yellow, or whatever. Maybe I want to make this WORD red, for emphasis. Maybe I want it to be centred:This goes against your case, because it's an argument for good design, under the control of a web designer, which is the opposite of what you're asking for. — jamalrob
Right - you can check out other forums then. I don't remember old PF being messy, or somehow being affected by the "lack of common standards of presentation". I used colors and headlines several times there, and it was very successful, no one said anything. I remember several people, including 180 Proof, using colors and different font sizes too!It would be messy, and communication depends on common standards, especially common standards of presentation. — jamalrob
Books aren't the only way of presenting philosophical ideas, and forum posts are nothing like books, so the comparison you're making is besides the point. If I present the ideas of WWR as a poster for example, do you think I'll fill it up with text like a book? Of course not. I will differentiate with shocking images, different font sizes, colors, etc. the important ideas, so that they can be understood at a single glance. And above all that, Comic Sans isn't even a good choice for presenting something like WWR - so if someone chose that, tough luck, he'd most likely be ignored.Are you saying that, e.g., the World as Will and Representation would have been better if Schopenhauer had been able to get it printed in his favourite purple Comic Sans? — jamalrob
BAM - THIS IS A BIG CENTRED HEADLINE
This is so great you just can't refuse it! — Agustino
For you, which is fine. You are free to disagree and have your own opinion. But there's a long way from having your own opinion, and thinking that other opinions aren't even worth hearing.It made his posts unreadable. — jamalrob
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.