If there is no scientific explanation about God, then there is no reason to believe in God. — some logician
Premise 3. All scientific explanations are about nature.
Premise 4. All scientific explanations are not about God.
Premise 5. No scientific explanations about nature is about God.
Conclusion 2. There is no scientific explanation about God.
Premise 1. If there is no scientific explanation about God, then there is no reason to believe in God. — some logician
There is no scientific explanation about the OP, therefore there is no reason to believe in the OP. — Mariner
Maybe there is. — some logician
All valid arguments are whose conclusions necessarily follow from their premises. — some logician
I think logic is part of science. Logic is included in science. — some logician
Many logicians support that logic is part of science. Philosophers of science do so. — some logician
By 'logic' I meant formal logic with natural deduction, such as first-order predicate logic. — some logician
I just claim that logic is part of science. — some logician
Many logicians support the claim that logic is part of science. — some logician
Philosophy is at least about arguments.
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.