I think logic is part of science. Logic is included in science. — some logician
Cosmological arguments include scientific concepts such as 'causality'. However, it does not follow that cosmological arguments provide reasons for theism. — some logician
The list of logicians who support the claim that logic is part of science includes: Rudolf Carnap, Hans Reichenbach, Willard Van Orman Quine, and so many others. — some logician
Wrong arguments are excluded in logical explanations. — some logician
Premise 1. If there is no scientific explanation about God, then there is no reason to believe in God.
Premise 2. There is no scientific explanation about God.
Conclusion. There is no reason to believe in God. — some logician
Alvin Plantinga — some logician
Then:What if I don't agree with your definition of belief??? — some logician
That's your opinion. Go ahead! — some logician
I agree that science is a continuously expanding domain - gobbling up other disciplines, even art and music, like a hungry shark in the middle of a shoal of fish. Its rational basis and clever use of math has turned it into a formidable tool to understand our world, the universe itself. So, to some degree I'm in agreement with the OP that lack of scientific ''explanation'' does pose a serious problem for theism. — TheMadFool
Premise 2. There is no scientific explanation about God.
Conclusion. There is no reason to believe in God. — some logician
Premise 1. If there is no scientific explanation about God, then there is no reason to believe in God. — some logician
Premise 1 is false. Not all good reasons for belief are scientific reasons. They can't be, otherwise there would be no basis for science. — Chany
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.