Then that would be saying that knowing how to spell the word makes it appear on the paper, which is absurd. — Harry Hindu
You know you can think it, but can you do it? Imagining yourself doing something isn't the same as doing it. If it were then the actions take place simply by thinking about it. But that isn't the way it is. For you to manipulate anything out in the world requires more thought - thoughts about manipulating your body to cause the manipulation of other things - like pencils and balls. I could just think about moving the pencil, but that doesn't make the pencil move. Are you saying that you have the power of telekinesis?
Thinking is an action, yes, but running is a different action. So is writing, speaking, etc. - actions that require more than just your brain acting.All thinking involves action, and I think our actions are structured along the lines of how we think.
To say these are not the same may be true, but it also may be the case that it is false. It all comes out to which provides a better explanation pragmatically. — Cavacava
I never agreed that they were the same. When did you think I did? I have always been arguing that thinking is a different action than say running, throwing a ball, or writing.You added this before I saw it (I think :D ) No, I thought we agreed that thought and action are inexorably enmeshed didn't we, now you want to bifurcate them? — Cavacava
If you can automatically do things just by thinking about it, then what is practice? What does that word mean to you?
It is easy to imagine yourself doing something you never did before. It is much harder to actually do it. Are you disagreeing with this? If it weren't true, you'd be able to dribble and shoot a basketball just like Kyrie Irving just by watching him dribble and shoot, and then imagining yourself doing it just like that.
Exactly. Yet that is how you answered the question because you fail to admit that you don't know that you can do something until you actually do it - at least once. Putting the letters in the correct order on some imaginary paper in your mind isn't the same thing as actually writing it on real paper with your hands. — Harry Hindu
I wasn't detailing every single thing it requires, though. That would be ridiculously missing the point. The point is that we can never have written it, but know that what we know is sufficient to write it. — Terrapin Station
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.