Can you find any evidence that condemning trespass was ever actually a rule, rather than just an emotional thought produced from the personal feeling of infringement, or violation?

Historically, the case of the payed train
platform where the commu ity was prom-ised all trespasses dealt with.

Hey @Christoff Montnielsensons, welcome to the forum. Writing an OP like that makes your thread very difficult to engage with, please see the site guidelines here and the how to write an OP guidelines here. While we don't usually write OPs of that described calibre, there are useful tips in there to make your post engaging.

Here are several things that make it difficult to engage with your post; your readers won't know what Rule One is, how it relates to trespass, Christianity, the payed train platform or the promises.

Doing what you can to make an OP an argument, or at least a thorough train of thought, makes it easier to engage with. The same guidelines hold for interjections in discussions; try to relate to what your discussion partners are saying! For example, is there a relationship between the "payed train" and @Metaphysician Undercover's reference to "infringement"?

Thank you for the feedback fdrake,
Your post does make sense and honestly
it makes me want to spend more time
meeting forum guidelines, productionwise.

fdrake, I think the preceding message was actually written by the author of "Christoff", Christoff being a half-baked bug-ridden AI program. Does "productionwise" tell you anything?