There's a quote function for quoting, which I didn't use, and posts are right below each other. I know reading and thinking are difficult for you but I have a higher standard for people's average reading abilities than that.
We've seen a lot about proving things to you. No one can prove anything to you, which you do not want proven. But anything which you want proven, you readily prove it to yourself. — Metaphysician Undercover
I don't know whether he is a rapist or not. But surely your past and present presidents were capable of other terrible things if not worse than rape. — Hailey
I don't know whether he is a rapist or not. But surely your past and present presidents were capable of other terrible things if not worse than rape. — Hailey
The subject being that you're totally partisan on anything to deal with US politics, which was an entirely accurate assessment by MU and which you then whine about as bullying tactics. And like any Trumpster, instead of reflecting on your own behaviour you double-down, by insisting a clear paraphrase is a misquote.
So I was on message and you're just trying to deflect.
Thank you for your education on rationalization. But does it occur to you that I'm justfying a crime he might have carried. I'm merely saying that when given two awaful candidates, where one might be a rapist and has said a whole lot of stupid things, whereas the other may be corrupt and is definitely pro-war, you got to decide what is your red line to exclude one for your vote.Assuming that past presidents were rapists or worse in order to justify Trump’s crimes is what we call rationalizing in the US. — praxis
You were trying to rationalize rape, and doing so very poorly. — praxis
Do you dislike women? — praxis
Top reason is, I'm not ready for Americas first dictator, and him trying to wrest the election out of the hands of the voters clearly indicates that that's exactly what he wants to be. — flannel jesus
That’s the biggest farce because in a republic one is allowed to believe an election was stolen and take steps to challenge it, — NOS4A2
There was not and is not evidence that they exist. Where were they supposed to "find" them?
Is dictatorship even possible in America under your political system? — Hailey
It makes no difference whether he meant find votes that can be discarded as illegal. There was not and is not evidence they exist. He was repeatedly told by the Justice Department and Georgia officials that they did not exist.
It is one thing to question results, but quite another to reject the evidence.
Why would someone trust the DOJ and Georgia officials? — NOS4A2
he was requesting they look for illegal votes — NOS4A2
Right. Anyone or anything that does not support Trump and his claims cannot be trusted.
That had already been done. He knew that but did not like that none of the multiple investigations supported his allegations.
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.