What accounts for this possible world being actual instead of one of the others? That is, why is this particular possible world concrete, as opposed to one of the other possible worlds? Is it just by chance? — Brayarb
Why is there this multiverse? — Michael Ossipoff
"Why is there this multiverse?" — Michael Ossipoff
Perhaps because if everything is possible then it must exist. Once its apparent existential arbitrariness has been thus removed, it is a simple step to accept that someone might inhabit it. — Jake Tarragon
That conflicts with the meaning of possible. If it must exist, it is necessary, not just possible.Perhaps because if everything is possible then it must exist. — Jake Tarragon
Perhaps because if everything is possible then it must exist. — Jake Tarragon
."Why is there this multiverse?" — Michael Ossipoff
.
Perhaps because if everything is possible then it must exist.
What accounts for this possible world being actual instead of one of the others? That is, why is this particular possible world concrete, as opposed to one of the other possible worlds? Is it just by chance? — Brayarb
You could additionally ask:
"But why am I in this possibility-world? In fact, why am I me, this particular person? Is that by chance?" — Michael Ossipoff
You could additionally ask:
"But why am I in this possibility-world? In fact, why am I me, this particular person? Is that by chance?" — Michael Ossipoff
It's like asking why number two is number two and not number three.
What would it even mean?
↪Brayarb
Because (to paraphrase Sidney Morgenbesser), even if our world weren't the actual world, you'd still be complaining.
(what I mean is that the question doesn't make sense) — Fafner
What accounts for this possible world being actual instead of one of the others? That is, why is this particular possible world concrete, as opposed to one of the other possible worlds? Is it just by chance? — Brayarb
What accounts for this possible world being actual instead of one of the others? — Brayarb
As I mentioned in the OP, I'm asking for what the answer would be IF the abstractionists' position was to be correct. I figure that it has to be chance, which is entailed by contingency, but I was checking to see if I'd failed to consider or understand something. — Brayarb
,.Michael Ossipoff
But there is a sense in which a sentence such as "this world is the actual world" expresses a tautology, since you would be saying something true by that sentence no matter what world you are in. — Fafner
So if it is a tautology, then there's nothing to explain, and that means that OP's question is confused.Yes, you could explicitly define "the actual world" as "this particular possibility-world." In fact, how I mean "actual" when I say that this world is actual to us because we're in it. And so that is a tautology when I say it. — Michael Ossipoff
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.