No matter how possessive a pantheist could be of others a pantheist still won’t parrot another person’s words and behaviour in a conversation!

Heterosexual genetics might be one way a religion works where women who are born with humble or outgoing personalities or assume them in later life could end up serving as a background that over centuries and many generations would reinforce virtues of a faith system like forgiveness! After all men would have to partially mimic the value system of women in order to attract them!

Mikaela Lafuente in SLOW MOTION 4k | NY SWIM WEEK 2023

A problem with hell is that no matter how hard you prayer it might fail to outmatch the permanent focus of a solipsistic mind and the blankness of an unconscious mind such that it'd be difficult to pray for someone to be sent to hell.

“An average person from Laos is 155.89cm (5 feet 1.37 inches) tall.”

I’d a dream last night in which I was walking around a DIY shop only to find a small male adult lecture me on angels not existing and that the west of Ireland is a victim of the queen. It’s possible that religion and science are capable of being reconciled through athleticism in a way that isn’t fully reductionistic. So smaller adults are capable of being far more reflective of the humility offered by a supernatural religion only if they were committed to the religion. For example the way certain Catholic Mediterranean countries tend to be slightly shorter in height than Ireland and how communist Laos is very short might relate to the cultures in those countries being more ethnically cohesive than Ireland. Yet height is a bit beyond conscious control and can be genetic.

An evolutionary argument for the existence of Christianity might fail when Ancient Rome would have appeared to have been the victim of evil by converting to Christianity in elevating the crucifixion of Jesus above all other Roman soldiers who died in battle!

If Jesus wasn’t a physical God then it could still have been ethical for Jesus to declare himself God because amoral people in Ancient Rome weren’t owed politeness. So from my viewpoint it’s still acceptable to view Jesus as a cultural God even if He didn’t create the world! A Christian version of science might be that Jesus was in fact God in ancient history but that he’s no longer God and is now more of a prophet of God.

Young Jesus Heals Mentally Sick Man - The Young Messiah scene

One way Catholicism as a supernatural belief system verges on a materialistic system is through a negative that elderly Catholics aren’t evil. Perhaps Catholicism could make more sense if young adults weren’t actually needed seeing as the religion isn’t a military. A dilemma with viewing a religion militantly is that warfare mightn’t be very ethical to begin with. For example elderly people can be so serious that evil elderly people could outcompete younger people if the country converted to evil which would make it harder for the country to convert back to ethics.

If a supernatural afterlife was indirectly connected to a materialistic system then one inference would be that any lay person who promoted an afterlife would be inherently nicer than others who didn’t offer anyone else an afterlife. Yet the catch is that they couldn’t downplay how nice they are to offer an afterlife if God wasn’t directly connected to the material world. In other words the lay people would themselves be representatives of a tentative afterlife to atheists. So how nice people are can be subjective when religious people try to be humble but therein lies the mystery as to whether they’re downplaying how nice they are to offer an afterlife in the context of being grateful to everyone else in their belief system also an afterlife! This line of reasoning would be useful to counteract racists that some religious people had at least tried to offer an afterlife even if they were abandoned by others in their faith.

Pantheism might not ever be a large religion but by the limits of its own belief system of a shared unconscious might relate to the most extremely spiritual people almost as an exclusive group. Even if there’d be very few pantheists it’s possible that there might be very high-status people who are at least tolerant of pantheism given the self-sufficiency of the faith! So an ethical version of pantheism would have to limit how splendid an evil version of pantheism where all pantheists might struggle with humility.

Nirvana as a peaceful afterlife might be more convincing to scientists than a heaven of bliss because were a shared afterlife only dependent on other souls and not on God than any bliss would be from the charity of others rather than from an omnipotent God. So from a more impartial standpoint maybe a Christian heaven would have an altering amount of happiness rather than a steady amount of happiness. Perhaps a problem in Christianity is to reconcile themselves to a relaxing heaven rather than just a happy heaven! For example believing in a very happy afterlife might lead to a volatile mindset of giving up the afterlife altogether whereas believing in a happy afterlife might help avoid a crisis of faith.

An immoral version of forgiveness is that no amount of vengeance, torture or murder is sufficient were the aim to dehumanise the original perpetrators such that only forgiveness would suffice! So who knows if Ancient Rome’s conversion to Christianity also had a Machiavellian element!

Pantheism might sound megalomaniacal until you realise that no amount of spiritual pride or violent lucid dreams or sensory solipsism would match the physical strength of top black athletes nor the amount of charity among the poorest people!

A biocentric and deistic account for Abrahamic beliefs in genesis might be how the observer effect means that time elapsed so quickly for God before Earth’s creation along with how short-lasting animal life is that it might have felt like the universe took a few days to create were there a deistic God!

The problem of evil exists in all systems including an afterlife. So one way an afterlife belief could backfire is if people no longer cared about anyone being murdered because the victims were claimed to have received an afterlife as compensation. Yet an afterlife isn’t just competing against science and materialism but also the mathematics of probability. So even if people couldn’t disprove an afterlife such an afterlife could still be rendered absurd if the odds of achieving an afterlife were little more than a lottery. For example if Islam took seriously the claim of being rewarded with 72 virgins in an afterlife then they could assess that afterlife materialistically only to find that Arabia simply isn’t sufficiently overpopulated to satisfy that particular afterlife. After all certain evangelical Christian groups in America have polygamy only to find that if one man has dozens of wives then dozens of men will have no wife. So if religious people felt a short afterlife had a 2/3 chance of success while a medium length afterlife had a 51% chance of success than anything longer would have decreasing odds of success. As such if people stopped caring much about their religious faith system then a last resort might be to equate an afterlife with a collective near-death experience as if mental time froze just before their death and ultimate reincarnation. In that case a near-death experience might still partially comply with materialism if victims simply tried to remember their relatives until the memory reified as a projection before death.

Strip poker where bluffing would be harder for less charitable people in an afterlife!
Uniting Nations - Out of Touch

One way to interpret a belief in an eternal afterlife is that people might underestimate how hard it is to live to 70 or 80 when many people in the ancient world failed to live past 40 or 50. As such a belief in an eternal life might be a form of humility to live to an older age when Europeans or Americans might underestimate how fierce Japanese people might be to live until their 90. Some young people might be flawed in taking a huge lifespan for granted.

One version of a Christian afterlife would be if other dead souls were like a recorded telepathic message of their prior selves from a distinct afterlife were an afterlife very deterministic or solipsistic. After all the problem of other minds would still exist in an afterlife. One way to reconcile Hinduism with Christianity would be if you were reincarnated like the baby Jesus in the manger at Christmas! Perhaps an unusual way to deal with re-incarnation would be to look at infantile photos of yourself with a milk bottle and a pram to brace for being an infant in the next life!

One way for science to view a supernatural Christian religion might be to re-interpret the pleas of Jesus for forgiveness as also being retrospective for ancient religions rather than just for subsequent generations. After all Jesus was raised in His very early years in Ancient Egypt after His parents fled Palestine. So the way modern religions fail to build as many temples as Ancient Egypt might imply that many religions are actually incapable of forming a very powerful theocracy even if they wanted to in a way that limits how powerful their supernatural realm might be. One way Ancient Egypt might be redemptive is that if people were all evil then they might not actually mind re-incarnation because they’d be re-incarnating into other evil people who’d be just as hedonistic as their prior life. As such a fear of re-incarnation might be slightly exaggerated in ethical and amoral people because they’re not fully self-aware of how self-sacrificing and nice they are such that they might view re-incarnation into future ethical people as being accidentally slightly boring! Thankfully few modern religions took cryogenic mummification too seriously!

The Mummy 1999 - Goodbye Beni (10/10)

Even if Jesus isn’t still alive in heaven then His message of forgiveness might still ring true where the more people you forgive in an afterlife then logically the more people there’d be to sustain your afterlife! Perhaps one reason we’re yet incapable of reconciling science and religion is that we forget how tranquil a deciduous forest could be when there has been so much deforestation in temperate climates over the past centuries. In other words the Amazon rainforest or Siberia are simply too intense in comparison to the relaxing vibe of a deciduous forest. So the way the peacefulness of a supernatural religion could exist is on a par with the New World’s deciduous forests remaining intact after hundreds of years in a way that didn’t happen but is possible through afforestation!

Pocahontas - Just Around the Riverbank (1995)

An irony of the problem of evil was that pantheism is theoretically capable of being the most evil possible belief system for no other reason than the flip side of declaring yourself God is to declare yourself self-created independent of both materialism and religion. Yet the way pantheism redeems itself can be to exceed evil so to speak as the enemy of all evil countries in history failing to be evil enough to match total independence. If materialism abandons ship at your death and leaves you to oblivion then pantheism at least lets you live in your sitting room for a while at least post death! The way in which a claim to self-prophecy isn’t actually evil is simply because people are still free to be atheist rather than only out of an insubordination to other religions.


Beauty and the Beast - Tale as Old as Time

What if we applied pantheism to animals? That way God would resemble a relay race as if God intermittently embodies both the predator and the prey to maximise athletic strength!

One problem with national borders isn’t just economic or cultural but also spiritual. In other words the idea of prioritising poor natives for help might be at slight of backfiring in the context of circularity. In other words is there a risk of an illusion where the country is on life support as a metaphysical perception! Is there a version of karma where closed borders in America might ironically emphasise open borders in their own history to outcompete all other countries with closed borders if they don’t reciprocate with a two-way shared border! Even if we don’t end up with open borders there might still be an educational value in understanding an ideal of open borders to pre-empt economic mismanagement in a country. So there’s a risk of improvised or exaggerated jobs as we see in the third world if certain people have to multitask several part time jobs to make ends meet. The primary problem in terms of spirituality is if people don’t glorify their own country but take their own country granted in a way that’s ripe for complacency. Were a country fully glorified then in theory all native working class people would be able to maintain their jobs with open borders simply because their ethnicity would’ve been an advantage were it reciprocated with their employers simply to like their own country’s history even though it’s indeed not the only criteria in order to avoid discrimination. The potential risk of not simulating open borders is if poor people in the third world accidentally normalise low paid jobs in a way that might not actually be sustainable in underestimating the need to either get further education or to re-skill in a different trade. In other words few people might suspect in a worst case scenario that actually everyone and not just most people might be outcompeted under open borders by immigrants from a different country. Yet they’d fail to take a hint that no was once relevant to normalise their country without properly viewing the country as a catastrophe to be vigilant and adrenalised enough to either retrain or to truly champion solidarity even under closed borders! That’s why a national sports rout can be so devastating as a symbolic worry in all other economic and cultural areas! Only the blankest possible expression can indicate that you were never once involved in another country’s culture to think they’d be tolerable as a counterfactual of reincarnating into! A limitation of anti-state activism is of temporal causation where by liking the history of a country and not liking the present country can create an ambiguity in how much more glorious a country secretly yearned to be relative to foreigners in a way that could appear unrealistic!


Commando - Mansion Shootout Scene 3/3

Perhaps one reason there hasn’t been an artificial intelligence apocalypse is that computers are so superior to humans that we weren’t even worth defeating! That’s how meta divine judgment could be! Likewise the impact of the world’s 8 billion population could be a stealthy version of karma where we might never fully know how irrelevant our country is to another country as if we were just “no-name” to another part of the globe. In other words we weren’t even worth being warned of how irrelevant our country could’ve been viewed. Hence the punishment of there being a third world might be a trickle down effect of irrelevance towards the first world if a first world country doesn’t take itself seriously enough. It’d be as if India tried to outcompete how relevant any other third world country once tried to be to even bother trying to advertise how irrelevant their own African or South American country could have been with so many slums!

‘During the filming of "The Passion of the Christ," Jim Caviezel, who played Jesus, was struck by lightning twice. The first incident occurred in Mata, Italy, while filming the Sermon on the Mount, and the second happened while he was on the cross. Additionally, a key set production assistant, Jan Michelini, was also struck by lightning during filming, earning him the nickname "Lightning Boy".’ ai overview

America might be a paradox of the Christian religion where capitalism and gun rights seem so insurmountable that American Christians might sometimes appear to be trying to parody the Christian religion as a final nail in the coffin so to speak. Yet the way Christianity is intrinsically forgiving means that anti-Christianity can backfire if they built up such a lead over Christianity that underestimating their own strength and surrendering to Christianity as a version of double espionage might make it nearly insurmountable for others to achieve an equal amount of supremacy over Christianity as we uniquely see in American exceptionalism. So the concept of surviving a lightning bolt in the Passion of the Christ set might have almost parodied the idea that Jesus might really have just fell into a coma on the cross without actually dying if the Romans weren’t skilled enough at taking His pulse for Him to re-awaken a few days later in the cave! Perhaps the idea of parodying the Christian religion can evoke determinism in creating a double negative such that who knows whether the lightning bolt was slightly more intentional than accidental if no one ever had to invoke a divine religion if everyone had already symbolically given up Christianity!

Mandeltrip - Symmetric Brot (2 Sets)

Viewing forgiveness as a double negative that becomes a positive mimics an acceleration in time as either you forgive yourself for not forgiving others or you simply forgive others as if the past simply wasn’t relevant. So a consolation of intergenerational self-forgiveness of your own ancestry is at the bare minimum to symbolise how another country doesn’t have to keep promoting evil even if they already committed evil. Likewise a nightmare can just be about forgiving a nightmare itself to pass faster through time and not just about forgiving others. Forgiveness mimics an external force acting on an evil mind engaged in perpetual motion much like Newton’s first law!

“The bombing of Nagasaki resulted in an estimated 35,000 to 74,000 deaths by the end of 1945.”

Perhaps part of the problem in desensitisation is increasing entropy and disorder as if prior world wars created so many casualties that citizens are desensitised to mass death even before a new war begins. So if we accelerated many conflicts then the death toll in Palestine is like an atomic bomb, the US invasion of Iraq was like a nuclear bomb and the conflict in Sudan has created more death than the Rwandan genocide but is partially concealed under the guise of a slow war of attrition. Perhaps if Christianity were like a working backwards mechanism to 2000 years ago then part of the dilemma might have been that people overlook how extreme the earlier conflicts might have been to produce less collateral damage as if soldiers in WW1 were so expendable that they didn’t need to risk killing too many civilians. By contrast soldiers in many conflicts today are given a backhanded compliment in bombing raids if poor people weren’t even prioritised in their home country to think their own soldiers needed so much protection. I suppose part of the problem with Holocaust denial in Palestine might be like a game of chicken where the impression of supporting nazism would ordinarily have created such an enthusiasm for world war that the resulting apathy in Palestine means that either they glorified nazism to such a huge extent that they can’t care about it in light of criminal psychosis or else they had already barely supported Holocaust denial. Hopefully the second option is more likely. A nuclear bomb is almost like a Sun God as an ethical defence!

Increased entropy over time can be a partial account for why there can be so many other complicated issues in society that have no full solution. So for example it can sometimes be challenging to fully justify statutory rape if society is already implicated in so much other violence even though there’s still a slippery slope to infantile paedophilia. Yet there’s also an inverse justification for statutory rape if infantile rape sometimes isn’t extremely evil then you’d ironically need statutory still being prosecuted just to downplay how stigmatised other paedophiles already are. The problem is you’d need a sixth sense to fathom how society reflexively find solutions from hidden variables that aren’t intuitive but run the risk of extreme controversy were it not fully analysed. So for example the way many sports stadiums might not have armed security in spite of disarming spectators might not be a great defence against mass shooters but you’d have to take everything into consideration to realise that were gun control never actually going to be enforced nationally then even the symbolism of gun control might still be successful in under-policed concerts or stadiums simply to deflect from paranoia around so many armed provocation defences and international warfare. In other words the slight paradox is that you might have to partially surrender national gun control to promote what would originally have felt like a far more extreme form of gun control in unarmed though under-enforced busy areas.


“Prior conflicts in Sudan, including the first and second Sudanese civil wars and the Darfur conflict, resulted in millions of deaths and even more displaced people. The first Sudanese civil war lasted from 1955 to 1972, the second from 1983 to 2005, and the Darfur conflict began in 2003.”