As in, instead of "polluting nature will lead to the future extinction of humanity," say, "Humanity is already extinct in the future. That is why we pollute nature today." — absoluteaspiration
Are you trying to refine your tool, or to understand it? I wouldn't worry too much about a faithful depiction of the world; rather more valuable is the reflection of self you find. If it's reasonably good, then you've discovered a novel kind of camera that takes worthwhile pictures!tim wood: For example, I tried, ..., but I'm prone to distraction. So the state of this theory is more of a sad reflection of my personal failings than a faithful depiction of the nature of the world, and it is intended to be understood as such. — absoluteaspiration
For example, since my statements are not incompatible with physics in principle, in what specific way could the theory interfere with an accurate understanding of causality? — absoluteaspiration
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.