Word.I find that the sort of work one does is more important than whether one works. The Bushmen are likely satisfied because they don't perceive their work to be drudgery. It's probably harder to be clinically depressed living in their society than for drones ensconced in cubicles in New York or Tokyo. — Thorongil
It's probably harder to be clinically depressed living in their society than for drones ensconced in cubicles in New York or Tokyo. — Thorongil
There are better ways to avoid first world problems than by moving to the third world where they have real problems. — Hanover
>:O Certainly, but I don't quite believe it's the same thing. Corporate behemoths do actually control the allocation and distribution of large amounts of capital in order to generate new production, so they are capitalists in that sense, they're certainly not communists.And North Korea calls itself a Democratic People's Republic. :-} — Thorongil
Which is what it is. Monopolistic corporate behemoths are antithetical to capitalism. Don't fall for the leftist equivocation on this word. — Thorongil
It's not all corporations that you don't like, just big ones, and it's not just big corporations you don't like, but just big businesses regardless of corporate status, and it's not all big business you don't like, just certain ones, namely the ones you don't like. It's also irrelevant to you whether the business is a monopoly. You don't like some even where there's competition. — Hanover
you doubtfully have any problem with the mom and pop restaurant down the street — Hanover
you might have a problem with the Dyson vacuum company — Hanover
you might dislike Wal-Mart — Hanover
you might like your local power company, despite it being a monopoly and not having any competitors — Hanover
what you don't like are those companies who do distasteful things, which has nothing to do with their corporate status and nothing to do with how many competitors it might have — Hanover
No, actually that's not true. I despise large corporations (>$10 billion revenue) because of the unfair financial strength that they wield. The rest of us cannot compete with them, because we don't have the financial strength to bully people, the way they do. And no law can prevent brute strength, we already know that.In short, what you don't like are those companies who do distasteful things, which has nothing to do with their corporate status and nothing to do with how many competitors it might have. — Hanover
No one likes companies that do disgraceful things, myself included. It seems you're trying to be overly technical when reading the terms I have employed in order to accuse me of being "hopelessly vague, equivocal, and ambiguous," when I think it was obvious the sense in which I used them. — Thorongil
No, actually that's not true. I despise large corporations (>$10 billion revenue) because of the unfair financial strength that they wield. The rest of us cannot compete with them, because we don't have the financial strength to bully people, the way they do. And no law can prevent brute strength, we already know that. — Agustino
Yes exactly, I think that's a problem that we're a consumer driven society. It encourages desires to grow, expand and multiply among the people, which only leads to more unhappiness.As a competitor you're unhappy, but since we're a consumer driven society, we care only about cheaper products, which is exactly what we get — Hanover
Right, so let's do some economics then.In part, yes. — Thorongil
Absolutely not. It's like at a Poker table. When I end up holding, say 70% of the entire tables wealth, then the others cannot compete anymore, even if they're much better players than I am (I can bully them). Profits in the short-term (in a perfectly competitive market) will always tend to be transformed into a monopolistic advantage - thus perfectly competitive markets naturally decay.but capitalism would prevent them from being so. — Thorongil
How do you define capitalism? If you define capitalism as free trade, then free trade is an advantage to those who are already powerful, so long as they know how to play their cards right. They will set the terms of how things will be done. Markets don't exist, people do.Then I return to my original point! They decay into something other than capitalism. — Thorongil
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.