It's a statement referring to a logic. — Barkon
So, yes and no. In your case, the way you ask this question, it's mostly no.Some empirical logics can only be understood by first understanding everything there is to know, because you would need to be able to sense these logics in the universe, thus allowing you to see all the empirical logic. This seems like the process of philosophy to me. Would you agree that philosophy is largely down to registering and thinking in line with empirical logics? — Barkon
Some empirical logics can only be understood by first understanding everything there is to know — Barkon
Logic is: reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. — Barkon
Empirical does not mean absolute, it means more probably. — Barkon
Logic is: reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity. — Barkon
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.