Not correct. There is no gap on the real number line. That's what it means to be continuous.If there is no gap between two instants of time then they lay on the same point. Is this correct or not? — MoK
If there is no gap between two instants of time then they lay on the same point. Is this correct or not? — MoK
It seems to suggest there's a duration of time between the discrete instants of time, which seems self-contradictory.That you could having 'something' between two points of 'time'. — AmadeusD
It is correct given the definition of gap. The events lay on the same point if there is no gap between them.Not correct. — Relativist
If that was true then Aleph_1 was the largest cardinal number.There is no gap on the real number line. — Relativist
There is no gap on the real number line.
— Relativist
If that was true then Aleph_1 was the largest cardinal number. — MoK
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.