Anyways, what are other people's most uninteresting philosopher/philosophy and why? — schopenhauer1
I didn't say you should implicate yourself.In other words, when one misunderstands it. — 180 Proof
The problem is the popular philosophers did something new and for this reason alone they can be deemed somewhat interesting. For me Heidegger is absolutely predictable and boring after reading one book I know them all, that's a style of philosophy easily replacable by chat gpt — Johnnie
Well, fwiw, I'd begin here ...I would love to hear your summation of Heidegger’s contribution to philosophy. — Joshs
I would love to hear your summation of Heidegger’s contribution to philosophy.
— Joshs
Well, fwiw, I'd begin here ...
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/790451
... and whose "thought" has engendered a few pseudo-intellectual (according to Chomsky et al) generations of "post-truth" p0m0 populism. No doubt, Heidi is very important but, imho, more as a negative example – how not to philosophize – than anything else — 180 Proof
I appreciate for the mention. Maybe my local public library will have a copy.Pretty much what Richard Wolin did in his Heidegger in Ruins book. — Joshs
Gladly. Here's some old posts ...I would love to hear your summary of Heidegger’s philosophy ...
I would love to hear your summary of Heidegger’s philosophy ...
Gladly. Here's some old posts — 180 Proof
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.